Doug Napier’s Stance on Corporate Charitable Giving

Doug Napier, CEO of 1792 Exchange, recently discussed corporate charitable giving on Breitbart News Daily. He emphasized that companies should reconsider their reliance on the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) for designating charities in their employee donation programs. Napier urged Benevity, a platform utilized for managing charity contributions, to eliminate what he described as “discredited and unreliable bias filters” from its software.

During his conversation with host Mike Slater, Napier highlighted that 1792 Exchange aims to push for corporate accountability and provides actionable data regarding corporate biases. He mentioned that their mission revolves around steering companies back to neutrality, focusing on essential aspects like shareholder value and employee treatment.

The discussion shifted when Slater referenced the White House’s view of the SPLC, noting that allegations against the organization—including 11 charges related to wire fraud and money laundering—might warrant more attention. Napier detailed how the SPLC allegedly misappropriated nonprofit donations to reward informants connected to listed hate groups.

Furthermore, Napier criticized companies for “consuming” and “regurgitating” information from the SPLC, specifically pointing to Benevity as a platform that potentially uses the SPLC’s “hate list” to filter out deserving charities. He highlighted that 1792 Exchange has contacted over 200 companies using Benevity, urging them to reevaluate their practices.

He pointed out that the SPLC’s designations put certain charities, which he deemed “worthy,” at risk of being overlooked. For instance, organizations like Focus on the Family and Turning Point USA have been unfairly categorized by the SPLC, leading to potential funding disengagement. He argued that this filtering process might deprive legitimate organizations of much-needed support.

Napier recalled an incident in 2012 when an armed attack targeted the Family Research Council building, linking it to the SPLC’s classifications. While he speculated on possible connections, he remained cautious about making definitive claims.

To further address these concerns, Napier communicated with Benevity’s CEO, urging the removal of SPLC-related filters, noting a lack of response from the company. He reiterated the call for organizations to ensure a fair opportunity for all charities, advocating for companies to undertake their own evaluations rather than depending on biased sources.

He pointed out that the indictment against the SPLC should serve as a caution to companies that often rely on third-party activists for decision-making, noting a growing sentiment among businesses of saying “enough is enough.”

The interview also covered the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index, which has expanded its criteria over the years. Napier observed a significant decline in participation within Fortune 500 companies, attributing it to the changing demands from organizations like SPLC and HRC that push companies to comply with activist agendas.

In closing, Napier encouraged individuals to reach out to 1792 Exchange if they encounter barriers while participating in charitable matches, particularly concerning conservative Christian organizations. He also welcomed insights from employees whose companies show signs of accepting SPLC or HRC narratives.