On October 1, 2017, Stephen Paddock opened fire on a crowd of approximately 22,000 concertgoers attending a country music festival on the Las Vegas Strip.
In about 10 minutes, one man killed 58 people and injured hundreds more. The massacre scarred the nation and became the worst single-actor mass shooting in U.S. history.
Even more suspicious is that the shooter allegedly used a bump stock, an accessory that allows the rifle to function like an automatic weapon but significantly reduces its accuracy.
But the most haunting aspect of it all may not be the event itself, but the complete lack of answers that followed.
Openable case
Paddock, 64 years old
wealthy retired accountanthad no criminal history, no clear affiliations, and no public signs of radicalization. In record time, the FBI announced that Paddock had no terrorist ties and was a lone gunman. This was declared even before a complete timeline of the massacre was established, before the number of victims was confirmed, and before a single motive was identified.
It's natural to wonder how the FBI could have known, loudly and unapologetically.
A crime of this scale, in which hundreds of shots were fired into a dense crowd, requires a careful investigation rather than a preconceived conclusion intended to allay public fear. The FBI has moved surprisingly quickly to completely deny any connection to terrorism or conspiracy, but has offered no plausible explanation as to why a retired accountant would carry out such a calculated and brutal attack. could not be provided either.
Motive “undetermined”
Stephen Paddock did not fit the profile of a typical mass shooter. He was not a lonely loner with a grudge or an eccentric young man seeking attention. He had no manifesto. He was financially well-off, at least according to those who knew him, and had little involvement in anything that would explain such outbursts.
Yet, within days of the attack, the media and law enforcement told the American public that there was nothing more to see, no larger conspiracy, just an inexplicable act by an inexplicable man. He declared. They suggested he had a gambling problem and that was why he decided to release the gun before turning it on himself.
You don't have to be a lifetime subscriber to QAnon wearing a tinfoil hat to ask some very serious questions here. If the timeline of events is not organized and even the total number of victims is not yet known, who can confidently say that Paddock acted alone, without outside influence? Why, despite years of investigation, has there been no real attempt to connect the dots and the motive remains “unsolved”?
amazing shooting skills
confirmed by police recordings
There were multiple shooters That day on another floor of the hotel. Witnesses reported seeing muzzle flashes overhead, possibly from a helicopter or drone, but nothing from the paddock room. Few shell casings were found in the hotel room. It was supposed to be a complete mess. Some witnesses saw the gunman inside the venue.
Paddock was and remains the unbelievable perpetrator of this massacre. The .223 caliber bullets fired from his vantage point were at the limits of their accuracy, but somehow hundreds of them found their mark in the confined space. Even more suspicious is that the shooter allegedly used a bump stock, an accessory that allows the rifle to function like an automatic weapon but significantly reduces its accuracy.
Growing up on a farm and hunting with my dad on a regular basis made me pretty knowledgeable about guns. I don't claim to be an expert, but I know enough to say this: In a windy situation like the one that occurs at that height, with buildings around you in an urban environment, bullets are all over the place. It must have been flying to .
The wind current alone could have thrown them 50 feet from their target, but somehow there were no casualties outside the concert venue, nor in the surrounding hotels or streets. It's hard to believe that Paddock, with no training and no recorded field trips, could achieve such accuracy.
Also consider the psychological profile. Mass shooters typically target people they hate. But Paddock's victims were ordinary Americans, demographically and ethnically similar to him. That makes no sense at all.
Saudi connection?
Additionally, there are some rather alarming details recently uncovered by investigative journalist Ian Carroll. On a recent episode of the Danny Jones Podcast, the rebel researcher said:
discussed Not only were there a number of surprisingly clean head shots discovered at the scene, but so were some surprising Las Vegas visitors.
On the day of the massacre, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was in Mandalay Bay. Just a few months earlier, in May 2017, MBS had begun a sweeping purge of his political and business rivals.
declare “No one survives a corruption case – no matter who he is, even a prince or a minister.” Considering this, one wonders if there is a Saudi connection to this massacre. It's not unreasonable either. After all, we must never forget 9/11.
But that's not all.
Consider the fact that at least eight key witnesses are testifying.
died Each of these individuals held information that contradicted their official accounts. Four of them told the media that there was more than one shooter, but some died mysteriously before they could reveal their identity.
Despite these disturbing impasses and unanswered questions, why was one of this country's most horrific massacres so easily swept under the rug? Was this treated like an inconvenient news cycle rather than an atrocity that demands a transparent investigation? The truth is still leaking from us, and the silence of officials only deepens the mystery and suspicions. is.
We must never forget what happened on October 1, 2017, even if those in power don't want us to.
