SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

A Trump-Putin peace agreement would have no significance without Ukraine involved.

A Trump-Putin peace agreement would have no significance without Ukraine involved.

Trilateral Meeting Plan Announced

Vice President JD Vance mentioned on Sunday that the White House is coordinating a trilateral meeting involving Russian President Vladimir Putin, President Trump, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. This could be a positive development.

Trump is evidently frustrated with the ongoing situation in Ukraine, expressing a strong desire to see an end to the conflict.

In the early days of his presidency, he shared that frustration with Zelensky, which, of course, culminated in some contentious exchanges.

However, Trump later pointed out that Putin appears to be “playing us against each other.” While Putin offered compliments and smiles, he simultaneously targeted civilians with missiles and drones.

There has been an improvement in relations between Ukraine and Trump. Ukraine recently signed a deal with the U.S. to set up a reconstruction investment fund, and European allies have agreed to finance U.S. arms for Ukraine. Trump also set a tighter deadline for discussions with Putin, but this Friday’s meeting takes place amid ongoing attacks.

So, what’s changed? Instead of imposing new sanctions on Russia, Trump has opted to meet with Putin this Friday.

Some reports indicate that Putin may have dropped calls for a change in Ukraine’s government. Still, he insists on claiming a significant portion of Ukrainian territory, including areas like the “fortress belt,” which has hindered Russian advances since 2014.

Moreover, even with sanctions, the violence continues, and Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkov, seemed eager to engage after Putin indicated he was open to negotiation.

However, any agreement reached between Trump and Putin holds little weight if Ukraine isn’t involved.

Interestingly, despite what some may claim, President Putin does not hold the upper hand heading into this meeting. His aggressive “summer attacks” haven’t yielded significant territorial gains.

While Russia has made some progress, it’s come at a staggering cost: around 250,000 soldiers killed and over a million wounded. The Russian economy is increasingly strained.

On the other hand, Ukraine has achieved unexpected victories, including using drones to target long-range bombers in Russia.

Putin’s position to set terms is shaky; he hasn’t bested his enemies—they’ve actually dealt him some humiliating defeats.

Some argue that only U.S. weapons have made this possible. Certainly, American arms have been crucial, but it’s the Ukrainians who are fighting and sacrificing. They’ve managed to defend themselves, making the geopolitical landscape safer.

When considering how dangerous Putin once seemed, especially during Ukraine’s quick surrender at the war’s onset, one must question where he stands now.

What other challenges does the United States face? Ukrainians aren’t obligated to us; rather, we owe them our gratitude.

Moreover, there’s no countdown to force any treaty on Ukraine. They’re resolved to fight. Even without American support, European nations are likely to lend a hand.

There’s a common understanding that Putin is untrustworthy. Any agreement lacking strict security guarantees for Ukraine may give Russia room to regroup and reassert its power.

That said, the ongoing conflict is devastating and Ukraine might have to consider making some concessions. However, these concessions must be their decision and supported by Kyiv.

Let’s avoid repeating historical mistakes like the infamous Alaska deal. It’s vital that Ukraine has a voice at the negotiating table. That’s the only pathway to achieving a just and lasting peace.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News