The Caribbean and U.S. National Security
The Caribbean has once again become a focal point for U.S. national security concerns. The administration of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela is facing accusations of collaborating with drug cartels that engage in trafficking drugs, weapons, and money across the region. In response, the Trump administration has ramped up military presence in Puerto Rico, deploying advanced aircraft and naval assets.
During a visit to the USS Iwo Jima near Puerto Rico on September 8th, Defense Secretary Pete Hegses emphasized that this was not a routine training mission; rather, it was aimed at disrupting narcoterrorists’ networks. Additionally, the Pentagon dispatched ten F-35 fighters to the island. On the same day, Maduro criticized the U.S. presence in Puerto Rico and the local governor’s involvement in military operations.
The military actions have sparked controversy. Representative Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.) has historically opposed the militarization of Puerto Rico but has recently discussed the reuse of former military facilities. Her remarks touch on a broader issue regarding Puerto Rico’s right to self-determination. Many feel that the island is being used as a base for U.S. operations without adequate consultation.
This concern is significant. Puerto Ricans, as American citizens, deserve a say in how the island participates in national defense. A vital question remains: do the people of Puerto Rico wish to take on this role?
The response to this question emerged on September 8th in the Puerto Rico Senate. Resolution 288 was approved, which formally supports President Trump’s stance against Maduro and narcoterrorism, aligning it with the mission of the Commonwealth. This was not externally imposed; it was a topic discussed and voted on by elected representatives in San Juan.
Such a decision signifies more than a mere legislative vote. Many Puerto Ricans believe that this connection can be beneficial. It might drive economic activity, boost the island’s security, affirm its role in advocating for more resources, and highlight Puerto Rico’s value to the nation.
Geographically, this role seems unavoidable. Puerto Rico lies along important ocean and air routes exploited by cartels, which destabilize governments and threaten communities far beyond its shores. When these issues spill over into places like Miami, New York, or Chicago, they directly affect American families. Addressing these problems in the Caribbean is not just a strategy; it is an urgent defense of American communities.
Engaging with federal missions also has practical advantages. Hosting a forward-deployed force will lead to investments in infrastructure, port services, and job creation. Collaborating with Puerto Rican National Guard units and police in joint operations can help build local capacities to fight organized crime. The island could evolve into a center of cooperation instead of being merely seen as a staging ground.
However, there is still a pressing need for oversight. Federal agencies must operate transparently and within legal parameters, while local governments should remain informed. Puerto Ricans need to have discussions about balancing security with accountability. A total dismissal of engagement ignores both the severity of the threat and the democratic choices made by Congress, as well as the voices of significant community segments.
Puerto Rico is not looking for special treatment; the desire is to be acknowledged as partners. The Senate has spoken, and many citizens see the benefits. Our strategic geography is important, and residents want security. Embracing the presence of the U.S. military doesn’t mean sidelining our voices. Rather, Puerto Rico is asserting its readiness to assist in protecting America from narcoterrorism.
