North Dakota Abortion Law Reinstated
A law in North Dakota that bans nearly all abortions has been restored just over a year after it was overturned. This decision came from a state Supreme Court ruling on Friday.
Interestingly, three out of the five judges concurred with a district court’s ruling from September 2024 that had previously deemed the law “unconstitutional and invalid due to ambiguity.” The Associated Press noted that for a state law to be considered unconstitutional, at least four judges must agree.
This particular law had been labeled “invalid for ambiguity” for over a year, but currently, there are no facilities available in the state to perform legal abortions—as reported by Reuters.
It’s worth mentioning that all three judges who upheld this ruling were appointed by Republican governors. There hasn’t been a Democratic governor in North Dakota since 1992.
According to the Associated Press, North Dakota is now one of 13 states with restrictions on abortion at any stage of pregnancy. During the 2024 presidential election, every state supported President Donald Trump by significant margins.
Republican Attorney General Drew Wrigley expressed his support for the ruling, stating that it was essential for upholding laws related to the pro-life stance. He emphasized the Attorney General’s office’s duty to enforce North Dakota’s laws.
In April 2023, former Republican Governor Doug Burgum signed a law that bans almost all abortions in the state, allowing exceptions only for cases of rape within the first six weeks of pregnancy, incest, and medical emergencies.
Currently, Burgum serves as Secretary of the Interior in the Trump administration and was at one point considered as a potential vice presidential candidate for 2024.
Republican Sen. Jeanne Myrdal, the sponsor of the 2023 bill, expressed her excitement and gratitude that the judges recognized the constitutional validity of the law, claiming it benefits both mothers and unborn children.
The pro-life organization, Students for Life of America, celebrated the ruling as it reinstates the legality status of the state’s pro-life laws aimed at protecting unborn babies.
Conversely, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of North Dakota expressed deep concern, describing the ruling as an “extremely painful” development. They asserted that abortion should be viewed as a healthcare issue rather than a political one, arguing that decisions surrounding it should be made collaboratively between pregnant individuals and their medical professionals.
The contrasting viewpoints in public discourse are evident, with some groups avoiding traditional terms like “woman” or “mother” in their discussions. This certainly adds another layer to an already complex and sensitive issue.





