Sen. Mark Kelly Addresses Military Orders Controversy

On Sunday, Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) faced a challenging question regarding military orders during an appearance on “Meet the Press.” After Kelly and five other Democrats recently released a video urging military personnel to “reject illegal orders” from the Trump administration, NBC host Kristen Welker pressed him on the matter.

Welker asked, “As a pilot who has flown 39 combat missions, if you were still in uniform and given an order to attack a suspected drug smuggling ship and kill the crew, would you refuse that order?”

Kelly, who was joined by Sen. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.), Rep. Chris Delzio (Penn.), Rep. Maggie Goodlander (N.C.), Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (Penn.) and Rep. Jason Crow (Colo.), stated that he sank two ships while serving and never questioned whether those orders were lawful. He mentioned, “People can and should be able to tell the difference between illegal and legal orders. If I received one, I would refuse it. If time allowed, I might consult a judge or lawyer. If not, I would simply say, ‘That’s against the law.'”

Welker pointed out the heavy burden these decisions place on military officers. Kelly agreed, acknowledging that while it’s a significant responsibility, any reasonable person can discern legality in such situations.

When pressed again about refusing direct orders during his military service, Kelly reiterated his views. He expressed concern over putting military personnel in difficult positions, saying that they might later find out their actions were illegal. This was a point he felt strongly about, emphasizing the need for leadership that respects the Constitution and the rule of law.

In light of recent events, Kelly’s remarks underscore a broader dialogue about military ethics and legal obligations. He concluded by stating that respect for service members is essential, highlighting a commitment from leaders to thoroughly understand and uphold these principles.