Joint military actions involving the United States and Israel against Iran are necessary and justified. President Donald Trump has clearly condemned Iran’s ongoing executions of civilians, its pursuit of nuclear capabilities, and its support for global terrorism. By taking a firm stance, he has indicated that the regime will no longer act without accountability. With the right support, our military can undertake this mission effectively, ensuring the safety of all Americans.
This initiative is a significant step toward neutralizing the threat posed by the Iranian regime; it follows Operation Midnight Hammer, a joint U.S.-Israeli effort to hinder Iran’s nuclear ambitions. However, it’s clear that mere military strikes won’t suffice. As long as this fervently anti-American regime continues to exist, true safety for America will remain elusive.
President Trump is aware of this reality and has urged the Iranian people to seize this rare moment to reclaim their nation. His statement emphasizes a pivotal truth: there cannot be any lasting peace or stability in the region without addressing the leadership of the Ayatollah and the corrupt system in place. The Iranian people deserve the chance to shape their own future.
Our nearly 50 years of experience with the Islamic Republic suggest it is fundamentally beyond redemption. Its essence is built on terrorism, oppression, and a deep-seated animosity toward America, Israel, and the West. Its extremist worldview utterly conflicts with the principles of peaceful coexistence.
For those who may feel uneasy when hearing “regime change,” let me clarify: Iran’s leadership is far more than just an authoritarian regime. The U.S. has often dealt with governments we find morally repugnant but still require their cooperation to protect our interests. As Gene Kirkpatrick pointed out in her important essay, safeguarding American interests necessitates the ability to differentiate between temporary alliances with less-than-ideal governments and our genuine adversaries.
From the very beginning, the Islamic Republic has expressed hostility toward America, from the initial taking of hostages to the unending financing of terrorism against American citizens and military personnel. The ongoing chants of “Death to America” and sponsorship of proxy militias sow chaos throughout the Middle East. This regime remains a persistent foe to both the United States and anyone seeking peace in the region.
The solution to this dilemma won’t emerge until this regime is consigned to history. That’s not to say the United States should invade Iran or install a puppet leadership. It’s about dismantling each pillar of the regime’s power to ensure its survival becomes impossible, while concurrently creating opportunities for Iran’s democratic opposition to emerge and establish a new, more representative government.
This transition has to be led by the Iranian people. Fortuitously, there is a robust national movement poised for such a change. The Iranian population has consistently demonstrated their desire for a secular, democratic republic that serves the people, rather than a theocracy. This path is crucial for neutralizing the Iranian threat and integrating the country into the global community.
The implications of such a shift would be monumental. Terrorists would lose a key benefactor, and adversaries of America would see a crucial stronghold diminish. Economic prospects would flourish, and Iran’s educated populace could prove to be valuable allies for the U.S.
We are already making inroads toward a future where this malevolent dictatorship no longer holds sway over the world. Yet, this complex issue won’t resolve itself without effort. Supporting a free Iran is both a moral obligation and a strategic imperative for fostering a safer, more prosperous world. May our military personnel find success in this noble pursuit, and may the Iranian people gather the strength to embrace their opportunity for freedom.
