Dark Sky Protection Act Proposed in New York
A state lawmaker, Manhattan Assemblywoman Deborah Glick, has introduced an intriguing plan that would require much of New York City to extinguish its lights after 11 p.m. However, some critics argue this approach might create more problems than it solves, especially concerning public safety.
The proposed Dark Sky Protection Act aims to have businesses and residents in the Big Apple turn off their lights from 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. The purpose is to save energy, reduce light pollution, and protect migratory birds, as outlined in the bill.
According to Glick, the legislation seeks to “preserve and enhance the state’s dark skies while promoting safety for people, birds, and other wildlife, conserving energy, reducing carbon emissions, and maintaining the aesthetic qualities of the night sky.”
Surprisingly, 80 percent of Americans today cannot see the Milky Way, a stark contrast to what our ancestors might have experienced under starry skies.
The bill is slated to take effect in January 2028. However, it holds exemptions for lights used for travel or public safety.
Yet, not everyone is convinced this is a wise move. Detractors quickly slammed the idea, claiming it might provide criminals with cover to operate under the darkened skies of Gotham. One particularly pointed comment suggested that criminal organizations surely would appreciate this proposal.
Some social media users echoed similar sentiments, sarcastically noting that this could enable criminals to act freely and implying that such a situation could be disastrous.
One observer shared an illustration of a pitch-black Manhattan, playfully stressing that, ironically, the city known for never sleeping might soon get an enforced bedtime.
“I support stargazing, but New York isn’t exactly the safest place,” another user remarked.
Glick, who plans to retire this year, also emphasized that the legislation would profoundly benefit migratory birds. According to the proposal, light pollution disrupts wildlife patterns, wastes energy, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, and negatively affects human health and our cultural connection to the night sky.
The bill notes that 70 percent of birds migrate each year, with 80 percent doing so at night, relying on the darkness to navigate. Unfortunately, the excess artificial light from urban areas can confuse them, causing collisions with buildings.
Despite the compelling reasons behind the proposed legislation, it seems unlikely to gain traction. Currently, it lacks a sponsor in the state Senate.
One political commentator remarked that it appeared Glick wanted to float one last “crazy idea” before retiring. Glick has yet to respond to inquiries about the bill.
