Sen. Tammy Duckworth Critiques TSA’s Shoe Removal Policy Changes
Senator Tammy Duckworth from Illinois is advocating for the reinstatement of the “shoe removal” policy at TSA checkpoints, which some argue improved security. This policy was put to rest by former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in July 2025. Since the change, travelers may have noticed a slightly smoother experience at TSA checkpoints—though that was disrupted by the recent government shutdown. I mean, let’s face it, air travel is stressful enough, and any little change that eases the process is generally appreciated.
However, a report from Noem’s Department of Homeland Security Inspector General raised concerns about the effectiveness of the new policy, citing issues with TSA scanners failing to adequately screen footwear. Duckworth is leaning towards reverting to the previous regulations, indicating that the current setup doesn’t work well.
Duckworth expressed her discontent in a letter to the acting TSA Administrator, pointing out, “Secretary Noem’s decision to implement the shoe-on policy… perhaps without proper consultation with TSA, was reckless.” She mentioned that the decision led to “new security vulnerabilities,” suggesting that the elimination of the shoe removal requirement could have dire safety implications.
And let’s not ignore how TSA checkpoints operate—agents don’t always thoroughly examine bags or passengers, and even if you beep at the metal detector, it might just result in a quick pat-down and nothing more. It’s a bit alarming, to be honest.
Additionally, there’s frustration over the TSA using scanners that struggle to effectively identify objects in shoes. It’s surprising, really. You’d think with all the taxpayer funding, the DHS and TSA would have more reliable technology by now, especially given the events of 9/11 were over two decades ago.
At this point, Duckworth is urging a reassessment of these policies. It seems like we’re regressing rather than progressing in airport security, and for many, that’s concerning.
