San Diego County officials, along with the Democratic-controlled Board of Supervisors, are receiving criticism following the plans for America’s 250th Independence Day celebration. What was intended as a tribute to the Declaration of Independence has shifted to include guidelines centered on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
The main aspect of the celebration will feature tribal blessings and land acknowledgments, as well as a community storytelling segment that focuses on “historically underserved populations” for about two hours.
Mayor Bill Wells of El Cajon and others have expressed concerns that the original essence of the American Founding is being overshadowed in the initial plans for the Fourth of July event on the San Diego waterfront. It appears the event’s funding was inadequate, with at least one sponsor withdrawing after being asked to comply with specific DEI principles in order to participate.
Wells suggested an alternative plan that emphasizes recognizing America’s greatness, coupled with fireworks and the national anthem. He outlined this on social media, reflecting the stance of some locals who feel the planned agenda is misguided.
Documents reveal that the celebration schedule involves welcoming guests with a tribal blessing, followed by various cultural and community performances. This includes the Black National Anthem and traditional music, all emphasizing diverse community stories from local tribes, Latinos, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, and other groups.
Additionally, there will be food trucks, booths, and other cultural presentations, ending with fireworks and a cleanup session. A critic, David McIntosh, likened the official celebration calendar to a political convention, suggesting a departure from traditional patriotic themes.
In February, Supervisor Jim Desmond proposed a plan to honor the 250th anniversary, emphasizing San Diego County’s connection to national defense. However, after the Democratic majority made amendments, community engagement with various historically underserved groups became a focal point.
Wells remarked that the shift in focus neglects the celebratory spirit of Independence Day, stating it conveys a perception that the country isn’t great. He criticized the use of taxpayer money for such changes.
The event’s requirements include sponsors aligning with the county’s DEI values, leading to at least one sponsor pulling out over this condition. Staff emails indicated that a pending donation could not be processed due to reluctance to comply with the new guidelines, while event arrangements struggled with insufficient funds.
Robbie Starbuck, an anti-DEI activist, characterized the celebration’s focus as excluding white communities. The criticism has been noted, but responses from the county regarding the backlash remain unanswered.
