A left-wing British politician has called on the government to change the law to allow people identified as transgender to change their legal gender posthumously.
Charlotte Nicholls, a Labor politician from Warrington North, called for changes to the written parliamentary question.Progressives are British gender recognition method It could be amended to allow a person to change their legal gender after death.
Her reasoning, Nichols argued, stemmed from the story of a murdered 16-year-old girl who was not yet old enough to change her gender at the time of her death.
“The genesis of the petition was the murder of my constituency, Brianna Gee. “His life was brutally cut short before he reached the legal age to do so,” Nichols said. GB News.
This would allow “dead transgender people to be legally remembered by the gender in which they lived,” the lawmaker added.
The ruling Conservative Party suddenly said there were no plans to change the law and that the government could already assess whether a person had a “new gender” before they died.
Equalities Minister Stuart Andrew said: ‘If a person used their new gender in an organization before their death and it remained on their personal record, it would be expected that the organization would use their new gender to engage with the family. “
Fellow MP Sir Liam Fox called the idea “patently absurd, factually incorrect and a distortion of statistics”.
The UK MP for North Somerset said: “We should not encourage the idea that people can simply choose to change their biological status and bend the truth to accommodate an ever more extreme and dangerous ideology. It shouldn’t be done,” he added.
Mr Nicholls has been photographed wearing sportswear in the UK Parliament. leather jacketreacted to the death of the aforementioned teenage girl and presented another idea.
Mr Nicholls suggested the government prevent children under 16 from accessing social media by giving them specially designed mobile phones.
“I would like to see legislation introduced so that there are mobile phones that are only suitable for under-16s,” she said, according to the newspaper. BBC. “So if you’re over 16 you can have an adult phone, but if you’re under 16 you can have a child phone. It’s not in,” Nichols added. .
The 32-year-old also suggested that the technology should be linked to parents’ phones, claiming it was “simply impossible” for parents to track their children’s activities.
Do you like Blaze News? Avoid censorship and sign up for our newsletter to get articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. Please register here!
