President Joe Biden’s lawyers reportedly pressured the Justice Department to omit language criticizing age and memory skills from special counsel Robert Hur’s report.
Source confirmed ABC News And that new york times Biden lawyers Ed Siskel and Bob Bauer wrote “in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland that details of the report regarding the president’s recollections during interviews with investigators were “openly, clearly, blatantly disclosed to the Department of Justice. “This is a violation of our policies and practices,” he wrote in a letter complaining.
RELATED — Jeffries: Her reporting is ‘un-American’ because people just want the truth that Biden was acquitted.the rest should be ignored
There are four people who have confirmed correspondence with him. new york times. According to ABC News:
A senior Justice Department official, Bradley Weinsheimer, said in a statement the following day, “The identified language was not provided with the intent to criticize or disparage the president, and therefore is not unfair or unfairly prejudicial. , is provided to explain Special Counsel Ho’s conclusions regarding the President’s mental state in the possession and retention of classified information.”
Following the release of Herr’s report, Siskel and Bauer responded to Weinsheimer’s letter saying they “fundamentally disagree.” [his] It assessed that the comments contained in Special Counsel Heo’s report were consistent with the department’s policies and practices. ”
“They never were,” they declared.
As Breitbart News reported last week, Robert Hur said in a report that the president suffers from cognitive decline, which affects his memory. Based on this, Mr. Xu recommended that he not be prosecuted for “intentionally” retaining classified documents. According to the report:
The report said the investigation “revealed evidence that President Biden knowingly retained and disclosed classified materials after becoming vice president and while a civilian.” It is said that guilt has not been determined.
However, Mr. Hsu’s assessment that Mr. Biden’s memory was “severely limited” also influenced the decision not to prosecute.
“We also believed that at trial Mr. Biden would likely appear before the jury as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory, just as he was when we interviewed him,” the report said. There is. “Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone that many jurors would want to clear reasonable doubt to.”
“It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict a former president, who was already in his 80s, on serious felonies that required intentional insanity.”
Mr. Xu’s report included numerous examples and assessments of Mr. Biden’s declining mental capacity and memory, stating: Biden’s memory also appeared to have significant limitations. ”
Shockingly, the report states, “He did not remember when his son Beau died, even years later.”
Recent ABC News/Ipsos poll It has been revealed that an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that Biden is too old to serve another term.
RELATED: Joe Biden calls Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi ‘President of Mexico’
White House
Director Paul Roland Bois award-winning feature film, exampleYou can watch it for free. YouTube or Tubi. “Better than Flower Moon’s killer.” Mark Judge wrote. “I’ve never seen a story like this before.” Christian Toto wrote. High quality, ad-free streams are also available for purchase at: google play or Vimeo On Demand. Follow him on Twitter @prolandfilms or instagram @prolandfilms.
