The Environmental Protection Agency allocated about $3 billion to states last year to replace hazardous lead pipes based on unverified data, according to a memo from the agency’s inspector general. This likely means that some states received too much money and other states received too little.
Investigators found two states submitted inaccurate data, according to Wednesday’s memo. The name of the state was not disclosed. The EPA has since made changes, but the inspector general said the agency could do more.
EPA Inspector General Sean W. O’Donnell said, “Inadequate internal controls to verify data have resulted in allocations that do not reflect states’ needs, and if left unchecked, the EPA will have no future credibility.” EPA Inspector General Sean W. O’Donnell said. .
EPA designates two permanent chemicals used in cookware as hazardous substances
The agency said it disagreed with some aspects of the inspector general’s memo, saying the lead pipe estimates were the best available and the correct way to allocate funds to states. The agency also said it has safeguards in place to ensure the funds are spent correctly.
The bipartisan infrastructure law provided $15 billion over five years in exchange for finding lead pipes. These pipes are especially common in the Midwest and Northeast, and are typically found in older homes. Lead can lower children’s IQ scores and delay development. It is also associated with high blood pressure in adults.
To allocate funding based on the number of lead pipes a state owns, EPA asked states and utility companies for estimates. Then, in April 2023, the agency released its results, saying there were about 9.2 million lead pipes across the country, and adjusted the funding formula.
Contractors are working on a leaking lead service pipe ahead of service pipe replacement on April 10, 2023. The EPA said it disagrees with the agency’s inspector general’s memo that claims inaccurate data was used to allocate funds to states for lead pipe replacement. . (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
Tom Neltner, national director of Unleaded Kids, said the totals in two states, Texas and Florida, were much higher than expected in those estimates. Florida ultimately received more funding than any state in 2023. The original estimate for lead pipes was about 1.2 million pipes, which came to $254.8 million.
“By submitting inflated information, you are taking money away from states that really need the information,” he said.
Texas and Florida did not immediately respond to messages left with the governor’s office and the Florida Department of Environmental Quality.
The Biden administration is prioritizing access to safe drinking water for all. Earlier this year, the EPA proposed a rule that would require most cities and towns to replace all lead pipes within 10 years. It also placed limits on so-called “permanent chemicals” in drinking water.
Republicans have repeatedly attacked the Biden administration’s spending on climate change and environmental priorities as handouts to leftist causes without adequate accountability.
The EPA’s Office of Inspector General is in the process of evaluating federal funding for lead pipe replacement and has previously communicated with EPA officials regarding some of its concerns. The inspector general is expected to release a final report in the fall identifying inaccuracies in each state.
The inspector general found that one state’s water utility submitted incorrect information to the agency and that “another state adjustment” was also submitted.
The agency said it had “performed a tremendous amount of quality assurance work” and disagreed with the inspector general’s assertion that its efforts were insufficient. Federal officials reviewed local lead pipe estimates and rejected some they deemed inadequate.
Even before the inspector general’s memo was released, some states had already complained to the EPA about unfair funding decisions.
A February letter from Massachusetts officials to the EPA said there were “serious concerns about the quality of the data EPA relied on.”
In early May, EPA adjusted its funding allocation for 2024 based on some new information it received from utilities. President Biden announced the funding at a stop in Wilmington, North Carolina. Texas saw the biggest drop in funding. $146.2 million was reduced by approximately $117.6 million. Florida had the second-largest cut, with a reduction of $26.1 million. Her eight other states or territories saw smaller declines.
Nineteen states received more funding, led by Minnesota with $48.7 million and New Jersey with $40.1 million.
Neltner said EPA deserves credit for gathering additional information to improve the accuracy of the funds awarded.
This $15 billion is just a fraction of the total amount needed to replace every lead pipe in the country. Eric Olson, a health and food expert with the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, said inflated estimates by some states could divert a lot of money to the wrong places.
“Let’s just say it’s suspicious,” he said.
Olson said it’s the responsibility of water utilities and the state to submit accurate information. But he said EPA also bears some responsibility because it “didn’t verify some of these numbers.”
When the agency began distributing funds, some states, such as Michigan, had long lists of projects they wanted to fund. Other companies don’t go that far and have to spend money on inventory first to find lead pipes. A few states even refused funding in the first year it was offered.
If states do not use all of the funds, they will be reallocated to states with greater need.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Neltner worries that if states receive more money than they need, they will spend the money on expensive lead pipe inventories instead of replacing them.
John Rampler, director of clean water for the environmental group Environment America, said the key question is how well states are using the money given to replace lead pipes.
“Even if all this funding were perfectly allocated,” he says. “You can’t remove all the lead pipes.”
