SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

If Trump wins, the Green New Deal must go

Health insurance premiums are borne by both individuals and employers. more than doubled Ever since the Affordable Care Act was passed. Today, Americans continue to face the heavy burden of high health care costs, something Republicans previously promised to repeal but failed to do when they took back power. It's the cause.

Eight years later, Republicans face similar challenges with the Biden administration's Green New Deal. Unless it is abolished completely, rising energy costs will follow rising medical costs.

When it comes to dismantling the far-reaching socialist programs enacted by Democratic presidents, second chances are rare.

It is important to take conservative action immediately. Lobbyists, donors and industry groups close to Republican officials appear intent on preserving key aspects of the law. Goldman Sachs coverage Without a statutory cap on tax credits, subsidies for inefficient energy sources under the inappropriate name of the Inflation Control Act could reach $1.2 trillion by 2032. Much of this money remains unused, but conservatives need to act quickly to repeal the law before it fuels inflation. Transition from reliable energy sources to unviable alternatives.

The oil and gas industry might be expected to strongly oppose such subsidies. But like many sectors in today's venture socialist environment, they find ways to benefit from government intervention. Their approach is, “If you can't beat them, join them.” Just as they profited from the credit deals tied to the ethanol mandate (which ultimately convinced Donald Trump to keep it in place), they are now using the complex and costly policy established by the new law. seeks to profit from such carbon capture programs.

of Wall Street Journal coverage Exxon Mobil, Phillips 66 and Occidental Petroleum are reportedly negotiating with the Trump campaign to maintain subsidies that benefit them. They fear losing essential tax credits for investments in renewable fuels, carbon capture and hydrogen, expensive technologies that will require U.S. support in the early stages.

Driven by regulations, subsidies, and the transition to green energy, Exxon and Chevron have invested more than $30 billion in carbon capture, hydrogen, and biofuels. Meanwhile, Phillips 66 aims to use “renewable fuel” credits to increase production of vegetable oil (a component now widely considered to be harmful to humans) rather than refining crude oil. There is.

“If we win, we need to put a scalpel to the IRA, not an axe,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer, RN.D., a liberal Republican senator from an energy-producing state.

In August, 18 House Republicans were sent. letter He called on House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) to urge Republicans to maintain an “energy tax” that includes large subsidies for unrealistic energy sources. This was followed by notice The Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute released a statement saying they oppose any effort to completely dismantle the Biden-Harris administration's green energy policies.

For those who remember the fight over Obamacare, this situation will feel like déjà vu. Republican special interests aim to increase flexibility in oil and gas production by eliminating drilling taxes and regulations while preserving core elements of the controversial law. The problem is that, with large sums of money backing these inefficient forms of energy, resource misallocation will continue to drive risky 'transitions' to the detriment of consumers.

President Trump must continue to be as bold as he is advocating for the complete elimination of all subsidies. His stance should be, “There are no headwinds or tailwinds for a single industry.” In an environment of low regulation and no subsidies, industries that can adapt and succeed will thrive, ultimately benefiting consumers. There remains ample opportunity for companies to benefit from policies that support the development of oil and gas pipelines, LNG terminals, refineries and the revival of coal production.

After decades of subsidizing and mandating “renewable” fuels, it’s time to stop treating this rent-seeking system as an emerging industry. Instead, we should demand that they prove their worth on a level playing field. It would be great if wind, solar, electric vehicles, and carbon capture could thrive without special treatment. Let's do that.

But continuing these failed subsidies will only move the national power grid to a less reliable source, leaving it unable to support us during natural disasters. This problem will be exacerbated by the government's push for electric vehicles. Building a power grid that relies on weak energy sources while increasing demand for EVs is a recipe for disaster. All these subsidies must be abolished.

Imagine facing hurricane season, power restoration, and disaster recovery with a power grid and vehicles powered by energy sources that cannot survive in a fair market. Compare Florida's quick power restoration after the hurricane to Texas' struggle during the winter 2021 power grid outage. of $66 billion 200 people died after Republican-controlled Texas spent on wind and solar power, leaving it reliant on a power grid that can't withstand cold snaps.

Mario Loyola of the Heritage Foundation Focus on the Wall Street Journal Florida is the most dependent on natural gas of the five major states, despite having no natural gas reserves. In contrast, California, Texas, New York, and Pennsylvania have abundant reserves but choose to rely on expensive, inefficient, and unreliable energy sources.

As a result, “compared to Florida, home electricity bills are 27% higher in Pennsylvania, 60% higher in New York, and 137% higher in California. Even in the pro-energy state of Republican-controlled Texas, the renewable energy sector is Our large size increases operating costs and complexity, and our electricity costs are higher than in Florida.”

If we fail to eliminate Green New Deal subsidies, our entire nation will mirror the energy landscape in New York and California. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes we made with Obamacare. This law needs to be repealed at the earliest, before it becomes “popular” and changes the market forever.

Republicans should use budget reconciliation to bypass the Senate filibuster to completely repeal the Inflation Control Act. This effort requires a firm commitment from President Trump, starting with appointing pro-consumer leaders to oversee the Departments of Energy, Interior, and EPA. He is not a pro-subsidy, anti-carbon figure like North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum. One of those roles.

When it comes to dismantling the far-reaching socialist programs enacted by Democratic presidents, second chances are rare. There are no do-overs. This is an opportunity you can't afford to miss.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News