All paid GOP influencers have etched these two words in conservative media consciousness. Don't expect the influencer to really make the Republican Congress promises a campaign. This is because you can't do anything with “narrow majority”.
The problem is not a narrow majority, but a widely opened tent of the Republican Party, so it welcomes more destructive factors than the southern border, so it has not crossed the border. The real problem is not a majority of GOP. It is the party itself. Until the Republican members unify a series of clear sets of principles, purposes, and goals, they hardly achieve them beyond Trump's administrative orders. This is an order that the future Democratic President will be overturned on the first day.
If you take the priority of the major policy of GOP's major voters, you can see that 70 to 80 Republican members oppose it.
Realistically, Republican members never hold 60 seats in the Senate, especially in democratic gerimander rings, do not secure a majority of more than 10 seats. So why do they promise the moon when the Democratic Party is in charge? Yes, the Republican members do not have 60 Senator seats, but not the Democratic Party. And the Republican members may have a hard time reaching 218 in the lower house, but the Democratic Party does not have numbers. However, the Democratic members need to continue to win the budget invoice and pass the law.
The answer is easy. Even if the majority of the house is strong, Republican members will face 95 % of the same problem. The problem is not a number, but a value. The free cocas, which truly represents the GOP campaign's rhetoric, is often far from other Republican factions than the Republican members coming from the Democratic Party.
Until the party focuses on the priority of the base -as the Democratic Party has done -Republicans do not have a “sufficient vote.”
Why not? While the media fixes Freedom Cocas, a much larger Reno Fact walks around the Capitol Hill.
Main Street CocasIronically, KTREET and Wall Street's lobbyist gateway boasts more than 80 members. It is growing only under a playing card clock.
If you take the priority of the major policy of GOP's major voters, you can see that 70 to 80 Republican members oppose it. It is before the Republican member is stuck between the free Caucas and the main streetcas.
Do you want to shrink the government? Name a single member of this group that supports eliminating one agency.
Do you want to end the immunity of vaccine responsibility? You can get more than 100 votes.
I would like to end the Great Protection Citizens Rights and crack down on illegal immigrants, but do you have to reduce legal immigrants? The problem is not a majority of the three -seater. Of course, dozens of Republican members block it.
Will you end foreign assistance? They fought in the Ukrainian army faster than to vote for what they support.
Will you end Green New Deal? They are already
I wrote the letter You request that you will stay.
Social conservatism is a dead end in most of these members and does not even get off the ground. But many of them come from deep red districts. Dustijonson, chairman of the main street Caucas, represented the entire South Dakota and voted for 29 points in Trump. However, they are members who mainly believe in financial and social liberalism, more immigrants, more refugees, foreign policy of Wilson, global warming policy, and political correctness.
If conservatives continue to ignore the preliminary elections, there is a possibility that 10 seats will be gained in the next general election, but the main street Cocus guarantees that conservative priority is dead when arriving. This member is growing faster than the free Cocas, as this member can rely on Trump's support to relieve major issues.
In the days before Trump, the main challenges were rarely successful, but conservatives were profitable in the open seats. However, Trump's support in the open race stopped that momentum.
Is the Rino problem of GOP simply the result of the narrow majority in the swing district? The red state offers a clear and clear answer.
Republicans have a majority in both rooms in 25 states, and many have a majority of rejection. If a swing voter really supports Trump's vision, the red state needs to make the most of his duty.
They are not.
In Texas, Republican members have elected the House of Representatives, which will be accepted by the Democratic Party in cooperation with the Democratic Party.
Despite the majority of the 32-18 GOP Senate in Montana, nearly one-third of the Republican members forced the change of rules that had controlled the Democratic Party of the Major Committee.
In Florida, after six -year conservative victory under Governor Ron Desantis, state legislative leaders refused to participate in immigration reform. House of Representatives Daniel Perez and Senator Ben Albriton rejected Desantis calls as “premature” and “irresponsible” in special sessions on illegal immigrants, even after Trump's support. They later extended their bones to the reform bill and fell into a large -scale open profit.
Some states such as Wyoming are promoting aggressive conservative agendas. However, this progress is only due to the majority of the free cocas.
The number of Republicans and the Democratic Party is meaningless, without building free conferences at both the state level and the federal level.
If the goal is to promote the agenda of Congress and the red state, why is Trump giving power to Linos? If all Reno, which should be a major target of the challenge of the free cocas, knows that he can rely on Trump's support, conservatives have not lost the ground with magazine. Is it?
You don't have to be like this. But as long as the focus does not change, it remains like this. Combining the narrow majority is an inconvenient excuse to distract from the real problems. It is a disappointing state of the Republican itself.
