It is reported that diplomats and officials have expressed doubt about the practicality of Europe, which actually provides 100,000 strong fields to serve as a peaceful army in Ukraine after patience.
European countries are divided into the practicality of generating and expanding executable peace maintenance troops in Ukraine in a theoretical frequency, and in other frozen disputes over the previous century. It may be potentially protected by the updated battle.
British record newspaper, Era, situation The European capital itself is divided into the wisdom of such a venture. Both seem to be fundamentally solved to show Russia's strength, but it is said that there is no agreement on how to achieve this.
In one camp, both the report and the general public reveal both the widely reported declarations of the related countries. Who says that Ion -Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland -Europe, including the UK, France, and the “Nordic” nation, should lead in Ukraine.
One of the “source” claimed by the report states that Europe can produce 100,000 peace -maintenance units without a single US “boots on the ground”, but European states have missions. He states that he is seriously lacking in the advanced air assets needed to be a mission. success. Therefore, the mission can be active without the army at the forefront of the United States, but it depends on the achievement of the general air dominance through the “byein” from President Trump and the Patriot Air Defense Missile System, and is probably implicit at this stage. In the case, it depends on fighting the air. Patrol by the US Air Force.
One of the outstanding features of the Ukrainian War is not to achieve the air superiority in Ukraine and Russia, but to return to a historic means like a trench battle. The European democracy is unlikely to commit the army in such a situation without a complete religion for the air umbrella that protects the army from attacks.
The further problem of Propia Keping Camp is that European troops are generally very technical but not set for sustainable businesses. In recent years, NATO has no military industrial complexes that supply conflicts like Ukraine, and the army has been repeatedly said that it runs out of ammunition. In a few days.
Ultimately, the purpose of the peace maintenance unit is not to fight, but if you do not have a strong deterrence that you can trust in an emergency, you may have a hard time to fulfill your intentional purpose to prevent further dispute. 。
Other camps include Germany, Poland, Baltic countries, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. They are deeply concerned that many European troops in Ukraine will soon leave the northeast of Europe. , Not dangerous. Baltic countries and Poland are not only the closest to Moscow, but not only the reasons they are all former Soviet countries, but also the Baltic Sea and Poland, which are most threatened by Russian extensions.
Assertion from Era The fact that the “Baltic countries” is all the same is the same mind, despite the Lithuanian Commander Lime and Vaiknoras. I'm saying this week The country will probably contribute to Ukrainian peace maintenance missions. Germany is also suspicious prime minister and Minister of Defense Both have made a contradictory statement about whether Berlin will contribute to the mission. In any case, the current government is very likely to have only three weeks of power in February, with a very weak voting loom's election.
It is not embarrassing that European NATO members are not members of the EU or NATO but have no equipment in European countries to establish air dominance, and the criticism of the Continental President. I am definitely emphasizing. However, perhaps the more comprehensive humiliating is the second scenario. Era, If the European army failed to realize, the UN Maintenance of the UN forces in the European soil in the “Indian, Bangladesh, Chinese” army.
Ukraine's President Volu Dimiler Zerensky repeatedly talks about the development of NATO peace maintenance in his country, and may have accepted the ceasefire in tacit -If Ukraine is not, it is Russia. This is because Russia is offset with the idea of doing it. All you have to do is use a battle break to regenerate the unit for future attacks. Zelensky is absolutely convinced that such missions require and guarantee the United States. Times “ Information source -European countries are not as brave enough to develop without the safety of the United States backstop.
He stated in January as follows. No one takes risks without the United States. Russia was angry at the concept of western nations, which warn foreign ministory warn “escalation beyond control” and prevent Ukrainian invasion in the Peace Maintenance Army.
