Wikipedia
Maintain The article on the site must be based on a reliable and public information source and covers the majority of the majority and important minority that appeared in those sources. ”
a
New study According to the Media Research Center, the free speech America emphasizes that Wikipedia discounts the information sources at the bottom right as a reliable thing, and is prohibited from quotes in the article, but the site is a liberal propaganda. Guarantee that it is just a repository.
Wikipedia's volunteer editors are mainly ideologists, mainly the cause, ideas, and personality of the left wing, and are not confidential for various stripes conservatives.
For example, Wikipedia editors who have blown off 29.2 % of the budget of the DEI program that are absorbed in the race between 2023 and 2024, trying to hide the military results of Vice President JD Vans for the 2024 election. did. Strategically Extracted A reference about the appointment of Camara Harris as a border emperor in the list of the emperor's emperor. Proposed Quotes anti -communist biases to delete an entry that detailed the mass killing performed by the communist system. It was labeled with a temporary suspension of Journalist Elon Mask, who is said to have violated the “Thursday Night Massacre” on his platform service conditions. And in light of the gas in the history, existence, and properties of cultural marxism, It is clearly defined and has a good chronic Derivative of Marxism as a “conspiracy theory”.
“Even if the source is valid, it is better to find a reliable source instead.”
a
2024 study In the reviews published in the online information review, it was found that Wikipedia is running. Formerly Executive Officer He is an American planning parent and was previously operated by a censorship graduate of the World Economic Forum Young Global Leader Program. -I suffer from “important liberal prejudice in selecting news media sources”.
“This effect lasts in consideration of the de facto reliability of the news media,” said Dutch researchers.
Currently, it is mainly handled by “propaganda” and exists only for “giving an established perspective”
According to It seems that the co -founder, Rally Sangers, is clearly lean against its prejudice.
In a new MRC survey, Wikipedia's editors are allowed to quote various reputable left -wing publications by promoting incorrect stories and fake news, such as Jacobin, Mother Jones, NPR, and Rolling Stones. However, I noticed that it was prevented from quoting publications that did not quote the staff of the staff. By liberal activist.
Quotation
Wikipedia page This study emphasizes that many reputable right trust publications are registered in blacklists.
For example, Wikipedia states that it is based on New York discovered by the news of flames, daily wires, daily calls, epochs, fox news, zero hedge, Washington -Freepy Con, Federalist, Red State, Media Research Center, Alexander Hamilton. Masu. Post “Do not usually use” as a source of information and “do not use it for information about living people.”
“Even if the source is valid, it is better to find a reliable source on behalf of it. If such a source does not exist, it may suggest that the information is inaccurate,” he said. Wikipedia entry has been added to the source you can do.
“Now you can only trust the fundamental story.”
Most of the publications of most right -handed spots were flagged as “generally unreliable”, but Brightbert's news seems to have been one of the few selected blacklists. 。 Wikipedia claims that “this site has announced many falsehood, conspiracy theory, and intentionally misunderstanding the story as a fact,” and was dissatisfied with the publications clarified the identity of multiple Wikipedia editors. I mentioned.
The New York Times is regarded as reliable, despite the incorrect accusation that President Donald Trump is lying on the Democratic's ambition of abortion. Characteristic The proposal that COVID-19 was transmitted on Wuhan Lab has conducted a dangerous experiment in Coronavirus, lacking fringe conspiracy theory.[ing] Evidence “; Printing a fake hamas propaganda, pushing the story of Russian conspiracy, misunderstanding readers on various other issues.
Rolling stone, I have
Millions were paid In the past, for example, for reporting false and honor ATORY losses, it does not seem to have learned the imaginable lessons that are imagined, for example, the ban on Florida, and the Daily Wire Michael Knowles. It was also characterized as “generally reliable.”
Politico, as well, received a reliable reputation, despite its willingness, or as a result. Help Former IntellignCE's official Caval, the official of the New York Post, misunderstands the reliable Hunter Biden Lap Top Story as “the cause of Russia” and misunderstands the relationship between the former President Joeviden and Camalahalis. I will interfere with the election. Vice President's campaign.
According to MRC survey, only 16 % of the left -wing media sauce could not secure Wikipedia's approval stamps. On the other hand, 100 % of the right -handed sources were on the blacklist effectively.
According to MRC research, “conservatives, Republican members, and Trump are appointed by the most popular online source for information about people, are crushed, malicious, and slandered. I mentioned it.
Christopher Bedford, a political senior editor and a blaze media correspondent Washington, said, “You need to remember. In fact, we were right about Cobid, I was in the trance. For the past decade, almost all major issues that affected the country were correct, but the outlet from the New York Times was embarrassingly wrong. ”
“Because they can't handle it, ideologies ban us,” said Bedford. “It's pathetic, but it's dangerous, and all the penny given to support this project is a penny given to speech and truth.”
“There was a joke about how Wikipedia did not rely on by historians and scholars,” said MRC Vice President Dan Schneider.
“The steep editors and staff have revealed almost everything they inject into the explanation of light EMPT for conservatives,” Schneider continued. “It wasn't something that people could rely on for accurate information. Now we can only trust a radical story.”
Like Blaze News? Bypass censorship, sign up to the newsletter, and get such a story directly to the receiving tray. Please sign up here!
