Following the terrorist attacks on April 22 in Jammu and Kashmir, India has initiated a focused operation against terror infrastructure across the control lines and within Pakistan. Named Operation Sindoor, this mission aims to send a strong message that terrorism will face repercussions. The operation specifically targeted identified terrorist camps, intentionally avoiding Pakistan’s military installations.
A government source mentioned that India’s response has garnered significant international support.
“What we see in Operation Sindoor isn’t revenge. It’s about making sure our people are safe. The country acted cautiously, and many around the globe recognize that. Leaders understand India didn’t strike first; it reacted out of fear,” the source noted.
Launched on the night of May 7, Operation Sindoor involved coordinated missile strikes on nine sites in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and parts of Pakistan. These sites were identified as training and logistical hubs for groups that India has long associated with cross-border terrorism, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed.
In response, Pakistan conducted drone and missile strikes targeting Indian military installations in at least 15 cities across the northern and western regions between May 7 and 8. Indian air defense managed to intercept these attacks.
As for international support, the UK was among the first to express solidarity. Foreign Minister David Ramie remarked that India had several justifiable reasons to be outraged over the Pahargam incident. This sentiment was echoed by former Prime Minister Rishi Snack, who stated that democratic nations should not permit cross-border terrorism.
Russia, while urging restraint on both sides, condemned terrorism in any form and emphasized the need to avoid civilian casualties, encouraging diplomatic engagement.
“Ultimately, Operation Sindoor sends a significant message that India will not remain passive in the face of terrorism. It will take action when warranted but will do so with caution. The global backing highlights that responsible nations acknowledge India’s right to defend itself,” a source commented.
Israel also aligned itself with India, with the New Delhi Ambassador stating that “terrorists have no place to hide,” reinforcing Israel’s support for India’s right to self-defense under international law. The European Union and all 27 member states issued a collective statement backing India’s position, while individual declarations of support came from France, the Netherlands, and Japan.
The United States has shown solidarity with India following initial reactions. President Trump termed the Pahargam attacks “abhorrent” and backed India’s right to respond. He suggested both sides should work toward de-escalation. However, Vice President JD Vance took a more tempered stance, suggesting it was essentially a local issue and affirming that Washington would advocate for de-escalation without direct involvement, stating, “This isn’t America’s war.”
Several Islamic nations have also reportedly supported India’s counter-terrorism stance. Saudi Arabia expressed concern about escalating tensions and emphasized the need to protect civilians. The United Arab Emirates and Qatar extended support for regional stability while recognizing India’s right to self-protection. Iran, while calling for restraint, condemned the use of terrorism for political gain and argued against harming civilians. Bangladesh, which has consistently advocated for a zero-tolerance approach to terrorism, has also supported India’s actions and Operation Sindoor.
Additionally, Panama, a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council, voiced its support, urging recognition of India’s right to defend against terrorism and the necessity for a unified international response to such threats.
