On Sunday, Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) expressed on CNN’s “Union Status” his belief that the question of lawmakers needing to address habeas corpus protections won’t arise.
Partial transcripts as follows:
Kristen Welker: Senator, I want to discuss comments made by Stephen Miller, a key aide to President Trump. He stated that the administration is “actively searching” for ways to suspend habeas corpus protections, which allow individuals to challenge their detention by the government. This is part of a larger effort to accelerate deportation policies. The Constitution mentions that this protection can’t be halted “unless there is a case of rebellion or invasion.” Would you vote to suspend habeas corpus, given that Congress holds that power?
Barrasso: The President has stated he will adhere to the law. He’s mentioned that if anyone disagrees, they should sue him. He won the election in all battleground states on the promise of securing the borders and enhancing community safety. People don’t want gang members like those from MS-13 in their neighborhoods. The Democrats lost because they opened the borders to millions of illegal immigrants, including criminals and drug traffickers. This was the focus of the election. Now the President faces challenges from radical district judges using their courts to impose national standards that complicate deportations, and I support the President in this.
Welker: I understand your point, but I’m curious, if this issue were presented to Congress, would you vote for a suspension of habeas corpus? That decision ultimately lies with Congress.
Barrasso: The President has indicated he will comply with the law. He expressed respect for the Supreme Court last week and hopes the Attorney General will proceed correctly, which I support.
Welker: Can you give a yes or no answer? Would you support the suspension of habeas corpus?
Barrasso: I don’t believe this will come before Congress. I think the President will continue to follow the law, which he has affirmed multiple times.
