There’s increasing concern that Joe Biden may not truly be in charge as president. Instead, it seems that key White House staff might be making significant decisions, possibly undermining constitutional authority. If this speculation is validated, it could cast doubts on the legitimacy of certain pardons and executive orders that bear Biden’s name but may have been made without his awareness or consent. Consequently, it’s crucial for Biden’s closest advisors to provide testimony under oath, and for others within his team to disclose what they know.
In light of this, the Department of Justice has initiated an inquiry into the pardons and other actions associated with Biden’s administration. This investigation looks at Biden’s capacity and whether individuals around him might be taking advantage of his perceived cognitive decline.
Meanwhile, the House Oversight Committee is intensifying its own investigation, primarily focused on the alleged cover-up of Biden’s cognitive issues. James Comer, the committee chairman, has expressed particular interest in the potential misuse of an autopen for executive actions.
There’s speculation about whether a particular staff member could be manipulating decisions to benefit their own agenda, raising questions about national security as well. The situation is certainly complicated, especially given the often secretive nature of politics in Washington.
Comer has requested interviews with several former aides, including Biden’s physician, Kevin O’Connor. If these aides do not comply, subpoenas may be issued. While Biden might claim executive privilege to protect them, it’s possible that his privileges could be overridden by the current political landscape.
The debate regarding the validity of any pardons or executive orders is not straightforward. Legal experts point out that there is no constitutional process to revoke a pardon once it’s granted, but this ignores the possibility of legal challenges based on potential fraud or counterfeiting.
The autopen, which is a mechanism that replicates a signature, has previously been used by past presidents. While its use is legal, it does require that the president gives explicit consent to have their signature produced. If Biden never consented to this or was unaware of its usage for certain documents, those documents could be deemed invalid.
In fact, the Justice Department had issued guidelines about the use of the autopen, emphasizing that the president must retain the power to authorize such signatures personally.
Given Biden’s perceived cognitive decline, the suspected extensive use of the autopen raises serious concerns. If aides are indeed concealing information about the president’s health, one wonders if they acted independently when issuing orders under his name.
Recently, there was an incident where Biden appeared unaware of signing an executive order related to liquefied natural gas. This troubling encounter left Speaker Mike Johnson feeling alarmed about the true leadership at play. It raises more questions about whether Biden is genuinely aware of the actions taken in his name or if there’s a disconnect due to his mental state.
There are intriguing disparities in how pardons have been processed, particularly with regard to Hunter Biden, who seems to have received his father’s direct signature, unlike others who might have had autopen involvement. Why the difference? Did Biden truly approve of those pardons, or did someone bypass his approval?
Moreover, observations indicate that Biden’s mental state has noticeably deteriorated throughout his presidency, leaving many to question who is effectively in control. In various public appearances, he has made statements indicating confusion about his surroundings and decisions, suggesting a failure to fully grasp his responsibilities.
The situation implies that there might be significant and unaccountable influence operating within the government, potentially violating constitutional principles. This calls for serious investigations from both Congress and the Justice Department.
In response to these inquiries, Biden has claimed that all decisions regarding pardons and executive actions were made by him, suggesting that opposing claims are false. But does that assertion align with the reality of his presidency? Did he even draft that response by himself?
Despite past warnings about a potential for Biden becoming a “Marionette President,” the prolonged tolerance of this situation is concerning. As more truths emerge, it seems that the deceptive narrative is difficult to maintain.
