Supreme Court Rejects Mexican Lawsuit Over Gun Sales
Judge Elena Kagan authored the opinion for the Supreme Court’s decision, which dismissed the Mexican lawsuit, characterizing the AR-15 and AK-47 as firearms that are “widely legal and purchased by many ordinary consumers.”
According to reports, the Court referenced commercial law protections when it unanimously ruled against the Mexican case on June 5, 2025.
Kagan noted that Mexico’s attempt to highlight specific gun sales and designs as part of its lawsuit was ultimately ineffective. She stressed the popularity and broad ownership of rifles like the AR-15 and AK-47.
Kagan stated in her opinion:
The allegations from Mexico regarding the manufacturers’ “design and marketing decision” will not yield any results. Mexico is focusing on the production of “military style” weapons, such as the AR-15 and AK-47. However, these firearms are widely legal and purchased by many regular consumers. Manufacturers cannot be held liable for the criminal activities of cartel members using these weapons.
As she wrapped up her opinion, Kagan commented, “This lawsuit is subject to the general bar of the PLCAA. Similar to the situation in Mexico, if the claims arise from the criminal use of a third party’s products, no legal action can be taken against the manufacturer.”
