Lifestyle influencer Tara Langdale recently discussed with Fox News Digital the negative feedback she received after a fashion post where she outlined what she deems “Unchic.” With a following of about 250,000 viewers, Langdale shared her video while sipping wine, looking polished with styled hair and jewelry, detailing her controversial list of style missteps.
On her “Unchic” list, she included items like tattoos, lululemon leggings, baggy jeans, and visible panty lines. This sparked backlash from some critics who accused her of politicizing fashion choices. Comments ranged from concerns about her political affiliations to observations about classism, particularly in relation to her views on tattoos.
Interestingly, she pointed out a recent article from The Guardian that described a “chic” style as something resonating with conservative aesthetics and critiqued the polished looks associated with Trump’s circle. Though she doesn’t identify strictly as conservative, Langdale emphasizes that fashion isn’t just about political identity.
She mentioned, “When I get dressed, I don’t think about my political party. Dressing is more tied to culture and personal background.” Her style can vary greatly; she considers her Sunday church attire modest but enjoys a more relaxed look in her everyday life.
Despite the backlash regarding her fashion opinions, Langdale questioned why TikTok users jumped to political conclusions based on her appearance. She noted, “Being blonde doesn’t automatically make me conservative,” and expressed that people’s reactions often come from their discomfort with differing views.
Langdale also tackled the notion that individuals who can’t afford luxury brands should not have a say in fashion. She stated that wealth doesn’t determine one’s style and critiqued the fashion industry’s focus on expensive brands. “Wealth whispers while money talks,” she remarked, suggesting that many wealthy individuals choose to dress down rather than flaunt their riches.
She admitted that her video may have come across as exaggerated, but her intent was not to target anyone specifically. Instead, she aimed to contribute to a trend that she found problematic. Since going viral, Langdale expressed discomfort over the direct messages and threats aimed at her and her family, reflecting on the nature of online interactions. “Do these reactions warrant the exposure? I worry about my family’s safety,” she said, adding that much of the negativity stems from anonymous users seeking engagement through offensive comments.
