Large university in Wisconsin provides almost $136K to student sex group

University of Wisconsin-Madison Allocates Funds for Sexual Health Programming

The University of Wisconsin-Madison has approved a budget of approximately $136,000 to support a group that provides sexual health programming, which includes a 90-minute session on “ethical porn” for students.

According to budget reports for 2026, the Sex Out Loud Club — referred to as a “peer-to-peer sexual health resource” — was granted $135,706.51 out of a total request of $136,475 for the years 2025 and 2026. Notably, over $90,000 of this budget is designated for salaries, with an additional $41,000 allocated for supplies and services. Of that service budget, $14,000 is earmarked specifically for programming purposes. In April, the club hosted its “Sex After Dark” event, which featured performances, bingo, and giveaways of sex toys.

On its website, the group mentions that visitors will be cautioned about mature content. Their mission appears to focus on promoting healthy sexuality through positive sexual education and activities, thereby creating a safe space for students to discuss these topics openly.

As for the specifics, the group offers various programs including a 90-minute session dedicated to exploring ethical versus mainstream porn, among other offerings. They also have programs tailored to LGBTQIA+ experiences, and activities like “Sex Jeopardy,” which mixes fun with educational content on sexual health.

Interestingly, the organization’s website features an extensive list of approved sex toy brands aimed at enhancing sexual wellness, emphasizing a respectful environment for all individuals. Some of these brands are queer-owned, highlighting inclusivity in their mission.

While the focus on sexual health is vital, it’s worth noting that reactions to such programming can vary widely. Some might appreciate the transparency and resources provided, while others might have concerns regarding the content and its appropriateness for a university setting. Ultimately, the university seems to be prioritizing an open dialogue about sexual health, albeit in a way that might rub some the wrong way.