SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Authorities Have Had Epstein Client List Since 2019

Authorities Have Had Epstein Client List Since 2019

Regardless of the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death or the existence of a so-called “client list,” it’s clear he was involved in human trafficking—a matter which, well, leaves behind a paper trail. Peter Schweiser noted in his recent episode of the Drill Down Podcast that JP Morgan Chase took over Epstein’s financial records, amounting to over $1 billion, and sent them to the federal government back in 2019. Yet, the question remains: why haven’t those records been made public?

Epstein File

After Epstein’s death, JP Morgan informed the Department of Justice that over $1 billion had been allocated for human trafficking activities, as highlighted by Schweiser. Eric Eggers emphasized the importance of tracing the money. So, one has to wonder: why aren’t there further investigations following JP Morgan’s revelations?

A notable episode of Drill Down featured interviews conducted during the Sean Hannity radio show, including a conversation with David Shane, a former attorney for Epstein. Shane still expresses skepticism about whether Epstein died by suicide, citing Dr. Michael Baden, who he calls the world’s leading forensic pathologist, and who Epstein allegedly asked for help.

“Logically, if Epstein had information on these individuals, wouldn’t he have used it to defend himself?” Shane pondered.

In response to Shane’s claims, he noted, “Baden has stated that throughout his extensive career, he has never seen injuries consistent with suicide.”

Schweiser pointed out, “Just because there’s no client list doesn’t mean these individuals aren’t grappling with issues.” He also raised a question about potential legal negligence.

“I don’t believe he ever threatened them,” Shane countered. “He actually liked their company. It’s worth noting, a woman who introduced others to Epstein provided a statement to the FBI, claiming Epstein had one rule: ‘You either have a fake ID or are over 18.’

Shane mentioned that he speculates the person responsible for Epstein’s death might have been someone seeking to be viewed as a hero.

In light of Attorney General Pam Bondy’s comments aimed at the media, Shane suggested she was referencing the entirety of the Epstein files, rather than a specific client list.

“My concern here is the sheer volume of human trafficking involved,” Schweiser remarked. “Ghislaine Maxwell is facing prison time, yet others aren’t being charged.”

“That’s a valid point,” Shane agreed. “Numerous affluent individuals participated in such activities, but evidence against them might not exist… Regarding Donald Trump, it’s evident that Epstein had no information relating to any dubious activities Trump was involved in.”

Big beautiful bill

During their time on the Sean Hannity Show, Schweiser and Eggers also had an interview with Randy Fine, a Florida Republican and one of Congress’s newer members.

What does Schweiser see as the biggest misconception concerning the bill at hand?

“Conservatives have long desired strong border security—building walls, enhancing ICE, and so on. Democrats have countered that offering pardons to millions could address border security. I believe we need to take decisive action now.”

He noted misconceptions around Medicaid regulations. “We end up providing Medicaid to individuals who shouldn’t have it—like illegal immigrants—who then can work.”

Fine won a special election to take over the term of Mike Waltz, Trump’s first national security adviser. In another segment of today’s show, Eggers engaged Fine, who has gained attention in the Florida State Legislature. Fine expressed regret that Washington isn’t yet a place of significant change but seemed hopeful.

“It feels like Rome is burning while people are just roasting marshmallows in the flames,” Fine remarked. He expressed disbelief over how many speeches are delivered to empty rooms. “I love to talk. But honestly? I prefer it when someone is actually listening. It really makes a difference.”

“My presence here is due to President Trump’s invitation. I feel like I shouldn’t be part of this. Our country seems to be heading in a troubling direction, and I believe the president and the Republican party are our last chance.”

While the bill might not fulfill every Republican’s desires, it’s often said that one shouldn’t let perfect become the enemy of good.

“I believe America was just inches away from significant victory when Trump was elected. And I don’t mean merely a small win; I’m talking about a huge leap. This bill may not be perfect, but it is about making progress—getting the ball forward and not just throwing passes.”

For further details on Peter Schweizer, listen to the Drill Down Podcast.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News