President Joe Biden’s approach to immigration has reportedly led to around 20 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States, raising concerns about their origins and intentions.
This situation now forces Americans to compete for jobs and housing with these immigrants, impacting schools, hospital wait times, and even government-funded benefits.
There’s a theory floating around that long-time politicians have either overlooked this issue or, perhaps, have subtly encouraged it. But illegal immigration is really just one symptom of a larger problem that we risk ignoring.
Take New York City, for example. It’s on the verge of electing local leaders from immigrant backgrounds—some of whom seem bent on altering the fabric of this once-great city. And then there’s a Congress member from Mogadishu whose agenda appears to shift America closer to a Somalia-like state.
These incidents aren’t isolated; they’re glimpses into a trend that emerges when political figures neglect border security.
For over two decades, politicians ranging from George W. Bush to Barack Obama, and now Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell, have pursued mass amnesty measures, seemingly indifferent to American identity or border security, but focused instead on increasing the influx of immigrants from lower-income nations.
In contrast, Donald Trump has surprised many with his stance on this issue. Under his leadership, illegal border crossings have drastically decreased, and significant steps have been taken to secure the borders.
However, there seems to be ongoing resistance in Washington. Both RINOs and Democrats continue to clash with Trump over amnesty for the millions of undocumented immigrants residing in the country.
This is why I’ve been advocating for a halt on immigration until all undocumented individuals are expelled from the country.
When I initially called for this moratorium, corporate interests pushed back vehemently. These are the same business leaders who promote trade agreements that outsource jobs, hurting communities like mine in Kentucky to fatten their profit margins.
My point is simple: I prioritize the well-being of American workers over corporate earnings.
That said, their arguments about the necessity of immigrant labor for economic viability are fundamentally flawed. If businesses had to comply with immigration laws, they’d face two choices: either raise wages, making these jobs more appealing to Americans, or invest in technology that transforms low-skill jobs into roles that can be filled by native workers.
It’s amusing when people brush off my assertion that Americans would take these jobs if the pay were fair by saying, “Americans don’t want to pick strawberries!”
But, really, it’s akin to claiming Americans won’t pick up trash. If the compensation were adequate, and we stopped undervaluing the work that helps families, I believe they would.
The urgency around immigration transcends economic arguments; it’s a cultural issue.
We are facing an invasion, and it feels as if we’ve brought an entire state’s worth of people who are unwilling to integrate.
They often don’t embrace our language, community, or shared values.
In my home state of Kentucky, local officials have been instructed to process applications in about 120 languages. This isn’t just impractical; it signals that we’re letting foreign nationals dictate their terms for integration.
Some of these individuals seem unconcerned about American identity, and we need to recognize their hostility at our own peril. It’s no exaggeration to claim that Western civilization is at risk. We can see this happening already in countries that have ignored the red flags.
Take Britain, for example, which has come under substantial influence from the Middle East. France and Sweden are grappling with severe immigration-related issues, turning into effectively unsafe zones every day.
Yet, the Democrats look at this and think, “Let’s replicate that in America.” Meanwhile, the RINOs shrug, accepting it as just the cost of cheap labor.
Both perspectives ignore the larger problem that ain’t going away.
Imagine if we had enacted immigration moratoriums two decades ago. Wouldn’t our housing market be less strained? Young people might have better chances to find homes and start families.
Health care systems and social services wouldn’t be overwhelmed by millions entering without any consideration.
And think about how much safer our law enforcement might be without the tensions surrounding immigration enforcement.
Sure, there are benefits for globalists and corporate players, but that doesn’t mean the American populace has to bear the burden of job losses, reduced safety, or weakened security.
America has endured the consequences of relentless political maneuvering for long enough. While we may not entirely reverse it, if there’s any hope for this nation and Western civilization, it starts with a commitment to a moratorium on immigration now.
