Justice Samuel Alito opposed the Supreme Court’s order to suspend the enforcement of the mifepristone limit, saying he had “justifiable suspicions” that the Biden administration followed the court’s decision.
“Here the government has not dispelled justifiable suspicion that it would even comply with adverse orders in these cases.
The High Court on Friday granted requests from the Biden administration and Danko Laboratories to maintain access to mifepristone.
When a federal judge in Texas first canceled Mifepristone’s approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) earlier this month, some lawmakers called on the government to ignore the ruling.
Federal officials were cool with the proposal as the moratorium request went to the Supreme Court, but Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said all options remained on the table.
Alito suggested in his dissenting opinion that the FDA may have leveraged its enforcement discretion practices if the government failed in court. The FDA sometimes chooses not to impose regulations or requirements on products or manufacturers, often ensuring that sufficient supplies are available. .
Danco Laboratories, which makes a brand-name version called Mifeprex, has ruled that the company must completely change the drug’s packaging and labeling and seek FDA approval, a process that usually takes months. told to
“However, unless FDA chooses to exercise its enforcement discretion to suspend Danco and the applicant’s documents provide reasons to believe that FDA will make that choice, it will not do so,” Alito said. is writing
He suggested that the federal government had not “dispelled legitimate doubts” that it would fully comply with such orders.
Alito, who last year produced a court majority that overturned the constitutional right to abortion, finally decided to vote against the moratorium.
“Contrary to the impression many may have, the disposition would express no opinion on the merits of the question of whether the FDA acted lawfully in any of its actions regarding mifepristone. He continued. is.”
Another conservative, Judge Clarence Thomas, said he would reject the administration’s demands, but did not join Alito’s statement.
None of the other seven judges publicly challenged the order, although it is possible they did so without disclosing their votes. At least he needed five votes to be allowed to stay.
Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.