America’s border crisis, Biden’s immigration policy, and the courts

In the recent New York Times Opinion article, Dara Lind The chairman of the U.S. Immigration Council asks:

But she admits that if the exception to the rule were true, many people would stay here and pursue their cases.

According to Lind, the answer is an increase in the number of arrests at borders historically seen as a crisis.

Rising anxiety was just part of it. Biden has also come under pressure from challenges to his border policy in court. for example, Florida vs USAU.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell, II parole + ATD (Alternatives to detention) practice is illegal and vacated it.

Wetherell argued that Biden “prioritized ‘alternatives to detention’ over actual detention, and by releasing more than a million foreigners into the country, turned the Southwest border into a meaningless line in the sand, Foreigners have found nothing more than a speed bump for flooding the country — based on exercising “parole” or “prosecutorial discretion” under a law that is wholly inapplicable.

Moreover, I don’t think Biden changed course. He seems to be still trying to keep his election promises. protect the values ​​of our country As a country of immigrants, our two main goals are to welcome asylum seekers and to find alternatives to detention. Wetherell’s decision shows how far Biden has gone to keep that promise.

of regulation Lind complains that it does not contradict its purpose. It would reduce illegal crossings by encouraging immigrants to use legal routes to the United States or to apply for asylum in one of the countries they transit en route to the United States. It does this by establishing a rebuttable presumption of ineligibility for asylum for immigrants who do not apply for asylum in any of the countries of transit and instead attempt to enter the United States illegally. increase.

Plus, he’s creating new ways for them to get here legally. Humanitarian Parole Program For immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who do not have entry documents. They are granted parole status before they reach the border, not after they have made an illegal crossing.

Florida vs USA Highlights

Section 1225(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Mandates the detention of arriving immigrants who do not have proper entry documents, with a few exceptions for parole.and these immigrants quick removal Unless you demonstrate a credible fear of persecution and torture.If they establish a credible fear, they are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge, but the Supreme Court Jennings vs Rodriguez Their detention must continue until an immigration judge grants them some form of relief or they are deported from the United States.

According to the judge’s ruling, from March 2021 to November 2022, the administration will Over 1.16 million Immigrants arriving in the United States on parole or simply as a matter of discretion.

The administration claims it does not have enough capacity to hold migrants. But this is more like the parable of a child who kills his parents and seeks pity because he is an orphan. The surge in illegal immigration during President Biden’s presidency was a predictable consequence of the previous administration’s termination of border security measures, reduced availability of detention facilities, and release of illegal immigrants into the country.

The Biden administration has called for a budget cut in detention spaces for fiscal year 2022 to accommodate 32,500 immigrants, and a further cut to 25,000 immigrants for fiscal year 2023. Sign the southern border.

The Administration argues it has the option of using Section 1225(b) to detain arriving immigrants or Section 1226(a) to release them. Section 1226(a) allows discretionary release of illegal immigrants. It provides that immigrants may be arrested and detained pending a decision to release them or release them on bail or parole under a warrant issued by the Attorney General. .

However, Sections 1226(a) and 1225(b) apply to immigrants in a variety of circumstances. The Supreme Court ruled in Jennings v. Rodriguez that section 1226(a) applies to “foreigners.” already domesticSection 1225 applies to immigrants who wish to enter the country.

Section 1182(d)(5) of the INA Approve the release of arriving migrants on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or important public interest.

Case-by-case consideration of immigrants released by the administration has focused on whether they are a public safety risk or a flight risk, not whether they meet parole requirements.

The administration advocates public interest by allowing parole in lieu of following the more lengthy process mandated by Section 1225.

Even if parole is properly granted on this basis, it is not permissible to create an entirely new process route to avoid the more time-consuming process the government has in place.

compliance with the law

The shrinking administrative detention space has made it impossible to detain a tidal wave of migrants arriving at the border without proper entry documents. 9,000-14,000 illegal crossings per day Title 42 is expected to end.

Biden could increase capacity and suspend entry of undocumented immigrants who cannot be accommodated. The Supreme Court hold or Section 1182(f) of the INA Gives the president the power to suspend the entry of foreigners. The president must ensure that the entry of eligible aliens is “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”

This need not deprive the asylum seeker of the opportunity to present a persecution claim.Biden was extended to them Central American Minor Refugee and Parole Program (CAM) Outside the US including adults.

Biden caused the border crisis, and he can end it.

Nolan Rapaport For three years, he was detailed before the House Judiciary Committee as an executive branch immigration expert. He then served for four years as an immigration attorney on the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Protection and Claims. Before he worked on the Judiciary Commission, he wrote decisions for the Immigration Appeals Board for 20 years. Follow him:

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *