Army Secretary Discusses Adaptive Strategies for Modern Warfare
In an interview, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll shared insights on the Army’s innovative approaches to meet evolving threats, particularly with the rise of explosive drones. He remarked that units like the 75th Ranger Regiment can sidestep the lengthy procurement processes typical of the Pentagon, allowing them to quickly test new technologies such as drones, sensors, and weapons.
After visiting the Rangers at Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah, Georgia, Driscoll mentioned that these elite forces can simply use government credit cards to purchase and experiment with new gear. “They operate outside the usual procurement framework, which gives them the freedom to innovate at a pace that traditional forces struggle to match,” he said.
Driscoll described the Rangers as “living GI Joe dolls,” and noted their impressive physicality during training drills. This raw power exemplifies why the U.S. prioritizes maintaining elite infantry units. However, he acknowledged that even top ground forces like the Rangers must adapt. The era of stealth operations, like quietly sneaking in under the cover of darkness, is changing—drones and other inexpensive tech make such insertions much more challenging.
“We don’t control the night like we used to,” Driscoll explained, pointing out that night vision equipment, once rare and costly, is now widely available to adversaries. This has led special operators to become improvisers, experimenting with everything from disposable drones to commercial quadcopters and custom weaponry.
Unlike traditional forces bound by rigid acquisition timelines, these elite units are designed to rapidly test and share insights with others. Yet, Driscoll admits that scaling these innovations across larger forces often runs into bureaucratic obstacles.
In the past, Congress provided the Army with broad funding categories, but now there are over 1,400 specific categories that restrict flexibility. Driscoll believes this rigidity could hinder the Army’s ability to keep up with fast-evolving drone technology, especially in light of developments seen in Ukraine.
Driscoll’s recent visit to the airfield followed a shooting incident at Fort Stewart, which is nearby. He commended the Criminal Investigation Division for their effective and prompt response to the situation, but underscored the Army’s commitment to preventing such events from happening again.
Looking ahead, Driscoll discussed the upcoming Global Force Posture Review, which is expected to adjust troop deployments across Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific. He reiterated that the Army aligns with the Department of Defense’s view of China as a significant threat, and it’s crucial for the Army to maintain versatility and readiness for rapid response in unpredictable situations.
While he refrained from sharing detailed recommendations for future reviews, Driscoll emphasized a key priority: counter-drone measures. “With the backing of the Secretary of Defense, we’re developing a plan to make substantial investments in countering drone threats worldwide,” he stated.
During his time in office, Driscoll initiated an Army Transformation Initiative, which he sees as essential for modernization to remain competitive against adversaries like China. “Looking back to the late ’90s when the Army engaged in suppression operations, not much has changed,” he said, highlighting the need for rapid adaptation to modern warfare challenges.
