What about former President Bill Clinton? obsessed with me.
In his new memoir, Citizen: My life after the White HouseMr. Clinton has spent at least 1,500 words over four chapters accusing me of orchestrating his wife's defeat in 2016, a humiliation that Democrats continue to reel from in the election.
Mr. Clinton's story stands as a masterpiece of bigotry, starting with his fundamental surprise. So, my 2015 book; Clinton Cash: The untold story of why and how foreign governments and corporations helped make Bill and Hillary richwas “political propaganda designed to help elect far-right wolves in populist garb.” Obviously false.
I started my thing clinton cash The survey was conducted in 2013, when Hillary Clinton was still secretary of state, long before she and Donald Trump announced their candidacy. What drew me to this subject was the Clinton family's own financial disclosures, which revealed that huge amounts of cash were pumped in and out of the Clinton family's political power (thanks, Bill!).
Particularly jarring was the fact that once Hillary was able to influence the diplomatic interests of her benefactors, foreign funding with ties to corrupt countries such as Russia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine skyrocketed (Clinton (The apparent purpose of the couple's international fundraising operation has been revealed.) (When donations to the foundation dropped to almost zero after her loss in the 2016 presidential election).
Much of Clinton's focus is on her next major revelation. clinton cash Later revelations confirmed Russia's takeover of strategically important U.S. uranium assets new york times and washington post. America's sales of uranium to its Russian adversary were alarming enough. What made it so scandalous was the fact that several of Clinton's cronies and big donors were enriched by the deal. Such a strategically risky deal required approval from Hillary's State Department, and it was approved.
Hillary Clinton is using the same evasions that defended her when the scandal was first exposed, blatantly claiming there was no scandal. Ta personally Approving uranium transactions. As the former president knows, that's the difference that makes no difference. In fact, it's not even a distinction. The necessary approvals were handled by a state official who was later found to have close ties to Clinton operative and Hillary campaign chairman John Podesta.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, address the audience at the Clinton Global Initiative Conference on September 22, 2014 in New York City. (Michael Loccisano/Getty Images)
In one of his most absurd claims, Mr. Clinton falsely claims that my “book surprisingly accomplished its larger purpose.” new york times and washington post Fully aware of who the author was being paid and his past work as a right-wing propaganda activist, he worked with Fox on an “exclusive” deal to use the book as a “resource” for their campaign. Signed. ”
Somehow Mr. Clinton wants you to believe that. new york times, washington postHuffington Post, Bloomberg News, and many Other left-wing and mainstream media were operating as part of a vast right-wing conspiracy. He slandered these media outlets and me, claiming that we somehow conspired to destroy his wife's campaign. I did not sign any economic “agreement” or “partnership”. times or post. That's a stupid lie.
Peter Schweitzer, author of the best-selling book “Clinton Cash” and director of the Government Accountability Institute. (Photo provided by: GAI)
The truth is that these news outlets reported on the large sums of cash the Clintons received from foreign governments and corporations, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. Because it was and remains a huge conflict of interest scandal.
The only prominent left-wing news person to push back on my claims was ABC's George Stephanopoulos (former communications director for Bill Clinton), who invited me on his Sunday talk show to attack the book. , and it was me. Mr. Stephanopoulos did not dispute the facts, nor did he disclose to his audience his apparent conflict of interest. He himself was a major donor to the Clinton Foundation. (Stephanopoulos recently said, Donald Trump was forced to apologize (He will pay $15 million in defamation settlements for comments he made about the president-elect on his show.)
Clinton's memoir is just the latest evidence of her obsession. clinton cash. Exhaustive in 2023 study by Columbia Journalism Review Weeks before my book was published, the Clinton campaign revealed that it had identified my revelations as the “single greatest threat” to Hillary's candidacy. This conclusion led to political mischief with significant historical consequences. To counter narratives that the Clintons compromised U.S. security with the uranium deal, the campaign pulled a dirty trick that evolved into the Trump-Russia collusion hoax that dogged Trump's first presidential campaign. .
Bill Clinton's purpose Citizen: My life after the White House It could have been a burnishing of Clinton's brand at a time when Democrats could tap into her old, smart, raw political instincts. But despite its political usefulness, Clintonism is inseparable from the people of Bill and Hillary Clinton, and no matter how much the Clintons and their allies try to rewrite it, it remains a scandalous history. will be forever damaged by it.
Peter Schweitzer is the director of the Government Accountability Institute, a senior contributor to Breitbart, and a #1 New York Times bestselling author. Blood Money: Why those in power turn a blind eye while China kills Americans and Clinton Cash: The untold story of why and how foreign governments and corporations helped make Bill and Hillary rich
