Change in Small Business Administration’s 8(a) Program Raises Concerns
Last week, Blaze TV host Christopher Rufo, alongside Judge Glock from the Manhattan Institute, addressed the controversial 8(a) program of the Small Business Administration (SBA). They highlighted a worrying trend: government contracts being allocated based on race and gender, raising questions about fairness, particularly for white men.
Despite operating under the current administration, Rufo and Glock argued that this aspect of the program contradicts the administration’s stated commitment to dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Rufo referred to the 8(a) program as a “$26 billion slush fund for government contracts” that excludes white men.
“We flagged this issue and emphasized that it undermines the president’s principles regarding DEI,” Rufo remarked.
Responses from SBA and White House officials were less severe than one might expect. Rufo recounted a phone call from Kelly Loeffler, the SBA administrator, and several White House staff members, some of whom expressed frustration over the publicity this “scandal” has received. However, they acknowledged the program’s faults and indicated a willingness to take action.
Just two days later, Loeffler made an announcement on X, stating that while it isn’t a perfect fix, it’s at least a start.
Yet, co-host Jonathan Keyman expressed skepticism. He questioned whether the government might hesitate to abolish the entire system, noting that many people, possibly including some Republicans, depend on it.
Rufo added, “My investigation suggests that the White House considered ending the program, declaring it unconstitutional. But there were legal hurdles—they were told they couldn’t just shut it down.”
He continued, explaining that while the article brought the issue to light, many challenges like entrenched corruption and political alliances complicate matters. He pointed out how Alaska benefits disproportionately from these contracts, mainly directed towards Alaska Native-owned businesses. Some of these firms then subcontract work to predominantly white-owned companies, creating a complex web of dependencies and political interests.
For instance, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) has reportedly insisted on maintaining the flow of funding due to its importance to the state’s economy.
Rufo underscored that even in traditionally Republican states, political affiliations seem to allow for a kind of legal corruption that perpetuates the problematic program.
Given the Trump administration’s promises to eliminate DEI policies, Rufo maintains that clarity is overdue. “It’s been a year; they must address this,” he stated.
While the SBA is beginning to include white men in the program, Rufo remains concerned that the underlying DEI framework still favors other groups disproportionately.
“The only reasonable move is to completely dismantle this system,” he argued. “It requires a thorough reevaluation.”
To delve deeper into Rufo’s investigation regarding the SBA’s 8(a) program, a video is available for viewing.



