Four new bills focusing on abortion care protection and “gender-affirming health care” are currently moving forward through the Colorado Legislature.
One such bill, HB 25, focuses on protecting “access” to this gender-affirming healthcare.
“Whenever they see the word “access” that progressive uses, what they mean is that they are forcing you to pay for something. They are forcing taxpayers to pay something, or to pay for a so-called transition, or abortion. Ally Beth Stucky Description of “relevance.”
“The bill codifies gender-affirming healthcare protections in state law, requiring that all health insurance plans in Colorado cover “medically necessary gender-retaining care,” she adds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdmbqnoaf-e
“Gender-affirming care is not medically necessary,” Stucky says.
But while we are concerned in the first place, another part of HB 25 puts parental and child custody.
Part of the bill, known as the Kelly Loving Act, passed at Colorado House on April 6th and is currently awaiting a review in the Colorado Senate.
“This is a very scary part of this bill,” Stucky says. “The court must consider all these e-music representations, misconceptions, threats and gender affirmation threats to publish gender-affirming care-related material as compulsory control in determining parenting time and child custody.”
“They have to see all of this when they decide to custody their parents, like the divorce custody battle, when it comes to how these parents treat their children,” she explains.
“So, if a parent is threatening to publish, for example, sensitive personal information about an individual, including sexually explicit material or material related to gender-affirming healthcare services, or to publish sensitive personal information about an individual, including sexually explicit material or material related to mistakenly gendering a police or authorities or an individual or individual’s child, they can blame the parent of a parent,” she continues.
An example of what Stucky uses is a woman who is divorced from her husband who declared he was a woman. If she continues to call him Frank when she wants to be called Sally, the judge must consider this in the battle of custody when awarding custody to his parents.
“So, if a parent refuses to acknowledge reality, to acknowledge the reality of his ex-spouse’s gender, to acknowledge his child’s reality, or to affirm these new identities, then the parent should be punished and punished,” explains Stucky.
“Essentially, the state will steal your child from you and if you affirm your biological reality, it will take your child of custody,” she adds.
Want more from Ally Beth Stucky?
From a conservative Christian perspective, to enjoy the rich and detailed coverage of Alli’s culture, news and theology. Subscribe to BlazetV – A network of voices of the largest multi-platform network that loves America, defends the Constitution and lives America’s dreams.
