It might seem a bit odd, but criticizing our military on its 250th birthday feels like another misstep from the Democrats. Last Saturday, there was quite a scene. One side showcased thousands of patriots supporting our armed forces, while the other displayed protesters, who claimed to be defending democracy, but were also seen waving Hamas flags and clashing with police. It was chaotic—led by someone like Randy Weingarten, who, oddly enough, seems more focused on social issues than many would wish.
Democrats, who effectively orchestrated Joe Biden’s re-nomination and manipulated the primary schedule to eliminate competition, have attempted to silence dissent—while lying about Biden’s capabilities. They seemed intent on presenting him as a qualified candidate to retain power, yet maybe they should have chosen their words more carefully.
The left seems particularly bitter that their vision for democracy went south last year when the majority opted for Trump, handing control to Republicans. Their “No Kings Day” demonstration felt like an emotional outburst aimed at overshadowing the Army’s significant anniversary and discrediting both the military and Trump, despite the Army being one of the most respected institutions in the nation. Their agenda appears to back everything the president does without much of a coherent plan.
The events on Saturday encapsulated this all too well. While Trump celebrated the Continental Army’s inception on June 14, 1775, with an engaging fitness event and opportunities to connect with military honors, it clearly didn’t resonate with many on the left. The idea that physical fitness aligns with right-wing values seemed to alienate them further. Seriously, could they be mistaking health for something political?
Just last year, there were discussions in major publications about certain societal issues—like how the push for fitness sometimes seems to hint at a shift toward conservative ideology. Strange, isn’t it? The Army’s celebrations spanned from past conflicts to today, showcasing our military legacy, offering a lesson in respect to those who brought children to protests rather than to experience a piece of history.
Interestingly, while Democrats seemed irked that Trump’s birthday coincided with Army celebrations, their critique missed the years of planning behind the event. Even the New York Times managed to describe it as a display of patriotism, albeit with mixed feelings about its purpose.
While the parade didn’t come cheap, with an estimated $45 million cost, it appeared effective in bolstering recruitment numbers that have stagnated recently. The reaction from some liberal commentators was quite telling, as their disappointment shone through when they couldn’t find a way to downplay the positivity surrounding the military celebration. It’s like they didn’t expect Americans to rally around their national pride.
However, not everyone was on board. A former West Point professor raised concerns about Trump’s influence on military politics. His resignation highlighted a tension surrounding military discourse in education—something that can get complicated quickly.
This, it seems, is another win for Trump, whether critics want to acknowledge it or not.
