Democrats believed they had solid evidence for convicting Donald Trump, but the release of certain emails might have actually cleared his name. This situation has echoed something House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) previously misspoke about—suggesting Trump was an FBI informant who helped capture Jeffrey Epstein.
In one of the emails to Epstein, it was noted, “I want you to understand that the dog that isn’t barking is Trump. Virginia spent hours with him at my house. His name was never mentioned. Police chief, etc. I’m 75% there.”
“This reinforces the theory that Trump could be the FBI informant who potentially led to Epstein’s downfall,” claimed Blaze TV host Sarah Gonzalez. “A few months ago, Mike Johnson somewhat casually mentioned, ‘He’s an FBI informant,’ but later retracted. Yet, once it’s out there, you can’t completely take it back. It was a significant slip from the Speaker.”
“He wasn’t downplaying Epstein’s actions, which were horrific. Johnson thinks Trump actively removed Epstein from Mar-a-Lago upon hearing about him. If Trump was indeed an informant, it complicates things more,” she explained.
“I also find it curious that Michael Wolff, a journalist who openly criticizes Trump and has been in communication with Epstein, sought ways to use Trump against him. He doesn’t come across as a nice person at all,” Gonzalez added.
In a discussion on the PBD Podcast, Wolff acknowledged that “Epstein thought Trump was the first to alert authorities about the activities at his residence.” This assertion marked a turning point in their relationship—turning them into adversaries.
“What’s intriguing is that Wolff, who despises Trump, seems to maintain relationships with those involved in sex trafficking. It’s almost as if they believed Trump was tailing them to report to the police, which fueled their animosity,” Gonzalez articulated.
“Then there’s Mike Johnson accidentally labeling Trump as an informant, while the emails suggest there’s a significant connection. Epstein’s words imply that Trump is the ‘dog that didn’t bark’,” she noted.
“I suspect the Democrats didn’t fully consider the implications when they released these emails. They must have had some awareness of what they were doing,” she concluded.
