This is a rough take!
Cities’ dog owners are marking their “colonial” territories with dogs that are “gentrifying” neighborhoods, critics say in a bizarre online debate.
The controversy was sparked by the cut The film explores the growing hostility between dog owners and non-dog owners in New York.
This article quotes Mia from Prospects Lefferts Gardens, the proud owner of two terriers, who has noticed growing anti-dog sentiment in community Facebook groups. That’s what it means.
One post about picking up dog poop eventually evolved into an outrageous accusation that PGL’s dogs were “gentrifying the neighborhood.”
Mia, a New York-born Latina, told the magazine that reading this made her wonder, “Does that mean only white people own dogs?”
Another woman with an off-leash dog was apparently filmed on a cell phone camera in Prospect Park.
“She was asking me why I thought I was special, why I didn’t have to put a leash on my dog. Was it because of my white privilege?
in This week’s viral tweetswhich was executed by user X, sparking further discussion.
“Big city dogs are settler-colonial in nature, with their owners moving in and occupying more space than the city allots, and making it someone else’s business,” the tweet read in part. There is.
by new york times“Settler colony” is a term of art recently adopted in far-left activist circles to decry everything from gentrification to poor environmental management to capitalism itself.
This term is by no means harmless, he wrote. wall street journal Editor Adam Kirsch says the phrase is one of the most egregious anti-Israeli phrases, especially in the context of the war with Hamas that began on October 7 after Islamic extremists launched a surprise attack that left people dead. He points out that it is becoming increasingly embedded in rhetoric. 1,200 Israeli men, women, and children.
“Settler colony” or variations thereof frequently accompany slogans that the Anti-Defamation League classifies as anti-Semitic, such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” Anti-hate groups say this is a rallying cry for “Israeli rights.” Destruction by violent means. ”
The author of the original tweet received a large amount of ridicule for his passionate opinions.
“What do you think about homeless people privatizing public sidewalks with tents?” one user joked.
Another reply slammed the word choice, saying, “It’s terrible to say ‘settler colonial’ to mean ‘excuse me.'”
Another derisive comment read: “BRB, create a marketplace to buy, sell and trade our personal urban space allocations.”
In response to the online uproar, the original tweeter added a follow-up a few hours later.
“Let me be clear: when you put this all together, trying to create policy around ‘good dog owners’ and ‘bad dog owners’ is nonsense,” he wrote in a follow-up tweet. was written.
“We need to pass common sense supply-side policies to maintain agreed quantities of dogs in major cities through license and registration fees.”
Until New York City’s approximately 600,000 dog collinizer setters and their owners succumb, we must learn to live under the oppressive paws of our canine oppressors and their owners.
