Sir Elton John has criticized the UK government, labeling them an “absolute loser” over a proposal that would let tech companies use copyrighted material without permission. He described the move as a “crime,” suggesting it’s inappropriate to alter copyright laws in favor of artificial intelligence firms.
In a recent interview with BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, John expressed frustration, stating, “The government has made the course take the youth away from their legacy and income,” adding, “I think it’s a criminal offense. I’m very angry about it.”
John also referred to technical secretary Peter Kyle as “a little idiot,” suggesting legal action if the government continues with the copyright proposals. Kyle faced criticism for his growing connections with major tech companies like Google and Apple, highlighted by a recent report outlining increased meetings with these firms since the election.
During the Senate session, John supported a proposal from CrossbenchPiabe Bankidron demanding AI companies to disclose their use of copyrighted content, which would empower creators to negotiate licensing agreements.
He recalled a similar amendment that was removed by the Commons government last week, warning of potential backlash against the copyright initiative within the legislative process.
“I feel incredibly betrayed. The Senate voted, and it was 2-1 in our favor. The government seems to dismiss this, thinking, ‘Well, old man… I can afford it,'” John remarked.
The government is currently seeking feedback on proposals allowing AI firms to train models using copyrighted material without consent. However, a source close to Kyle indicated that this option might no longer be viable, although it remains under consideration.
Other solutions include maintaining the current status quo, requiring AI companies to obtain licenses, or permitting the use of copyrighted works without the consent of creative professionals.
A government spokesperson mentioned that “we will not consider copyright changes unless we are completely satisfied with working for creators” and stated that their commitment to an economic impact assessment of the proposal would address a variety of related issues and options during discussions.
