England Courtrooms Look to Ban Wigs for Being ‘Culturally Insensitive’

A British court has reportedly decided to scrap the requirement for barristers to wear traditional wigs following claims it discriminates against lawyers with “Afro-Caribbean hair”. It is reportedly under consideration.

Iconic British courtroom attire becomes latest scalp of wokism as barristers face calls to waive their obligation to wear wigs in court on grounds of being ‘culturally insensitive’ there is a possibility. telegraph paper report.

common habits date The wearing of wigs dates back to at least 1685, when Michael Etienne, a black barrister with a big Afro, could be held in contempt of court if he refused to wear a wig, claiming: Following the alleged incident in 2022, he became the subject of intense investigation. This request amounted to a kind of “hair discrimination.”

Although wigs are still compulsory in the Crown Court, Court of Appeal, and High Court, the requirement to wear wigs ended in 2007 in family courts, civil proceedings, and Supreme Court proceedings.

Rachel Bale, a mixed-race barrister, argued for the tradition to be scrapped completely, saying wigs were “not fit for purpose” for some people with black hair.

“What is often overlooked in black culture is that hair is inexplicably important and that it is completely intertwined with your identity,” she argued.

Lesley Thomas KC, a prominent barrister who is also of African descent, described the wig as a “ridiculous costume” and a sign of “cultural insensitivity” in the British justice system.

“Wigs should certainly go away. There is no room in modern society for barristers to wear 17th century fashion,” he said this week, adding that other “old-fashioned” dress code items such as bands, collarettes and winged collars He added that it should also be abolished.

A spokesperson for the Bar Council said: “Following questions from barristers regarding wigs and hair discrimination, the Bar Council has established a working group to review court attire taking into account all protected characteristics.”

“The working group’s findings are currently being discussed with the judiciary as part of a regular dialogue on equality and diversity issues.”

Follow Kurt Jindulka on X: Or email