With last year's disastrous box office revenue revealed, I was relieved to assure so-called experts that this year's box office revenue would all set it right. good…
“As of Sunday, the film generated $1.34 billion in the US and Canada this year, a 7% drop from the same period in 2024, according to ComScore.” Report Left end LA Times. “March was particularly weak. The month is expected to fall 50% year-on-year. Business is bad as the first quarter of last year was significantly reduced from the level before age 19. It's really bad.”
Anyone with basic mathematics skills already knew that. What's interesting about this? LA Times The article dares to suggest that product quality (i.e. movie) could possibly be an issue.
Imagine it!
The era I spoke to John Fitchian, who was once in charge of the National Association of Theatre Places. Today he runs a consulting company and is interested in making interim budget films.
Fithian points out that streaming should not be the death of a movie, as movie lovers found a way to watch a movie on TV and so they found a way to watch a movie via streaming.
correct.
When it comes to the continued, ongoing excuses for the entertainment industry, he brings science when it comes to the excuses that the communal pandemic has unfolded films and films. [Broadway, concerts, sports] It has grown to rebound after the pandemic, but the cinema industry is not. ”
So why were these other release events recovering and not films? The Fitian tells the truth. “The problem is that there is a significant reduction in the number and quality of films offered in the theatrical distribution, which is not purely a pandemic effect.”
He added, “The decline in film quality and quantity had already occurred before the pandemic.”
Finally. Finally! Finally!
It should be noted that he hasn't said there are fewer films being released after the pandemic. He says “the number and quality of films.” […] It has decreased significantly. ”
next LA Times Ask the true beauty: “I think people intuitively believe that the quality of the film has declined over time, is there any evidence?”
This is “What evidence does it have evidence that the reason why dogs don't eat dog food is because dog food tastes bad?”
Look at the box office revenue!
I say to ya. These people are something else.
Fitians answer questions diplomatically. “It's hard to get good data on quality. But if it's a Marvel movie meal after the Marvel movies, even if they are, the consumers visiting the film will say, “You know, there's no more anything I want to see in the film anymore.” Where can you find a mid-budget romantic comedy?
As I've written hundreds of times, many movies prove that people still want to go to film: Top Gun: Maverick, Barbie, Inside Out 2, Oppenheimer, Wicked, Deadpool & Wolverine, Dune, Avatar… If people change their habits of moving the film, nothing will succeed.
There is a very simple way to point this out…
A cinema will be opened on six screens. Plays on three screens Top Gun: Maverick, Oppenheimerand Barbie. These theatres have full seats and lines for the next show are out the door. It's on the remaining three screens snow white, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destinyand Exorcist: believers. In these theatres, you can lob a hand-ren bullet without hurting anyone, and the only one waiting for the next show is Tumbleweed.
So, what is the problem here? Have people stopped going to movies or have people stopped going to movies that are not appealing?
If people are no longer going to films, then films are not successful. period.
Sorry, I've awakened Hollywood. The problem is not our dog, but your awful, divisive, preaching, self-righteous, anti-human nature, gay, sexless, child-clothing dog food.
John Norte's first and last novels, The time I rented, I'm winning 5 star rave From everyday readers. You can read the excerpt here Detailed review here. But you can get it Hardcover And on Kindle and Audiobook.
