AI Job Concerns for Gen Z
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly common in various industries, younger workers, particularly those in their 20s, are growing anxious about how this technology might impact their careers.
A recent survey from an online job platform revealed that 72% of Gen Z employees believe AI could drastically reduce entry-level corporate positions in the near future, leading many to reconsider blue-collar opportunities.
Career expert Jasmine Escalera from Zety noted that this generation’s shift toward trade and practical jobs reflects a desire for stability and purpose in a world increasingly influenced by AI. She referred to this trend as an “Aixiety Pivot,” highlighting that fear and uncertainty surrounding automation are driving significant changes in their career choices.
The survey, which polled over 1,000 Gen Z workers in the U.S., revealed a troubling trend regarding job security in relation to AI. Around 65% expressed concerns that their college degrees might not shield them from automation’s impact. Additionally, 18% were unsure about their current career paths remaining relevant a decade from now.
Interestingly, many members of Gen Z are taking proactive steps in response to these challenges. Approximately 43% are modifying their career plans for an AI-influenced job market, 40% are pursuing new skills or certifications, and 29% are seeking entirely different industries.
Stacie Haller, a chief career advisor, indicated that a significant number of recent college graduates are gravitating toward trade careers. She pointed out that these jobs often provide practical work that is less likely to be automated. Many graduates are also recognizing that their degrees may not lead them to fulfilling positions and are, instead, exploring more practical alternatives that are in demand.
More than half, or 53%, of respondents felt that skilled blue-collar jobs, such as those in construction or plumbing, would be less vulnerable to AI. In comparison, 47% believed that professions centered around human interaction, like healthcare and education, would remain safe, while only 12% considered roles in management or technical fields secure against automation.
