SELECT LANGUAGE BELOW

Georgia Appeals Court Order Makes Fulton County Trump Verdict Nearly Impossible Before Election Day

(L) Republican presidential candidate and former First Lady Donald Trump and former First Lady Melania Trump take the stage at the end of day four of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 18, 2024. (Photo by Winn McNamee/Getty Images)/(Right) Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis arrives for closing arguments in a disbarment hearing at the Fulton County Courthouse in Atlanta, Georgia on March 1, 2024. (Photo by Alex Slits/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

By Brooke Mallory, OAN Staff
Friday, July 19, 2024 1:04 PM

An order issued late Tuesday afternoon by the Georgia Court of Appeals makes it nearly impossible for a Fulton County election interference lawsuit against former President Donald Trump to be decided before Election Day.

advertisement

The order, shared by former President Trump’s lead lawyer, approved a petition for oral argument in an ongoing appeal by eight defendants in the case, including the former president, seeking to have Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis removed from the case.

Most notably, these oral arguments were scheduled by the Court of Appeals for December 5th.NumberMore than a month has passed since the presidential election.

Court proceedings have been stayed until the Court of Appeal issues its decision.

During oral arguments, the appeals court will hear the co-defendants’ appeal of a March ruling by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee that removed special prosecutor Nathan Wade from the election interference case but retained District Attorney Willis.

The co-defendants argue that McAfee’s decision was inadequate and that the disbarment of Willis and the dismissal of the charges should have been the result of McAfee’s decision, and that an illegal conflict of interest arose from Willis’ romantic relationship with Wade.

But McAfee said that under Georgia law, the situation did not create a conflict of interest. He went on to say that the facts created an “appearance of impropriety” for the prosecution team, which “infected” them.

Judge Wade later chose to resign, and the judge gave Judge Willis permission to proceed after issuing an ultimatum that he must either recuse himself from the case or fire the special prosecutor.

Stay up to date! Receive the latest news directly in your email for free. Sign up here: https://www.oann.com/alerts

Advertisement below

Please share this post!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp

Related News