TThe British public continues to be very forgiving of the failures of the royal family, which is understandable when the family is vulnerable and suffering from a serious illness. Great public sympathy has allowed for the revival of a doted-on vintage style of reporting that may have seemed ridiculous just a year ago, but is unwelcome in the long run.
recent palace announcement For example, Prince William's claims that he is now a “global politician” have not been received with the same enthusiasm as his self-appointed homelessness expert, his decision to grow a beard, and his domestic comments a few days ago. It is. Tip: Remember to turn off the palace lights before heading elsewhere. Even the ones made by professionals are unbearable. tanned royal video Inspired frolicking in the meadows was almost uncritically accepted as the new Windsor normal, and perhaps it is.
Having said that, new revelation It suggests the palace may not want to have too much confidence in the current lack of judgment regarding the vast untaxed assets of King Charles and his successors.
It's not Channel 4 now. dispatch, sunday times and mirror After an impressive investigation, they revealed what the royal family had been hiding until last week. Previously understood as a self-deprecating royal slang term for collective royal labor, “company'' is now a completely accurate term for family-run companies. Trade for profit. In the case of the Dukes of Lancaster and Cornwall, lands granted to the king and his heirs, profits last year (in addition to the sovereign grant) amounted to £27.4 million for Charles and £23.6 million for William.
While it is known that the royal family is exempt from tax on business profits (the royal family has started paying income tax voluntarily), research has shown that these include the military, NHS, prisons and even Charles. It has been revealed that rents collected from charities to which the Crown Prince and Prince William belong are also included. Regular customer. William, a former military officer, wears a uniform at all ceremonies. Reportedly 'Practice' The owners of the duchy are probably aware that they are billing the Ministry of Defense for training on Dartmoor. and to moor a boat at the Royal Naval College.
letter to daily telegraph The retired major general's testimony confirms that the disgust caused by these revelations is not limited to Republicans. Charles is the commander in chief. “The amount may be relatively small,” the major general wrote, “but the optics are frightening.”
In the wake of these reports, to understand the scale and purpose of the Duke of Lancaster and the Duchy of Cornwall, it is important to note that the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) department of the Duke of Lancaster and the Duchy of Cornwall, better known as the Royal Family, is essentially a large real estate company. needs to be reevaluated. You will be envied by less competitive companies.
The company's CSR experts, Charles, William, and their more glamorous dependents run brand-enhancing projects such as Early Childhood, Reading, Candle Carols, and Mental Health, while their less prominent colleagues accumulates and raises land rents, sells mining rights, collects intestate assets other than those of the deceased, and rents out houses (Including non-standard items) and monetize everything from beaches to scout shacks. William may be a limited politician. As a property king with a used jacketHe accomplished something that hasn't yet been achieved: giving a moral lecture without immediately delivering retaliatory insults about one's business practices, like, say, James Dyson.
Similarly, less fortunate spiritual leaders must dream, in addition to their share of the royal fortune, of real estate income that would allow Charles to think freely about what he called the “great paradoxes” of existence. It doesn't have to be. Perhaps the rich contradictions between untaxed rents and “faint memories of distant harmony that rustle like the wind in the leaves” Charles Observations, 2002“Man has two sides – his feet on the ground and his head in the clouds.”
William similarly seems at ease with the giant paradox, linking his mission as a global environmental authority to: dispatch The controversial sale of quarry rights to German company Heidelberg Materials has been revealed.
Talk about the Earthshot Award “It's really important that I'm doing something good in my role and my platform,” William said in South Africa last week.
After newsletter promotion
Was it intentional or by arrangement that what was advertised as an “extensive” interview did not feature the week's royal news or talk about “doing something for good” in the tax-exempt Duchy? Perhaps it should be supervised. Don't be mistaken for indifference. Because at home, even the royal family's media allies, including unforgiving critics of the Duchess of Sussex's jam business, are forgetting that the tax-paying public contributes to the duchy's owners' tax-free commercial income. Because I'm wondering if that's the case.
There are more legitimate doubts about the core family's candor, integrity, and claims to spiritual authority than of Prince Andrew, a friend of the deceased pedophile who currently does not generally attend church-based events. This could threaten its stability. Still, a nation that can tolerate the preaching of the current Archbishop of Canterbury is probably not in a position to insist on the moral guidance of his colleague the King. If Archbishop Justin – former mentor of former Postmaster General Paula Vennels and now Sorry for not acting sooner in Recent prolific sexual abusers It has something to do with the Church of England – which still believes it is entitled to educate the public during emergencies and Christmas, but why technically Charles, Welby's boss, shouldn't be doing the same? I wonder why?
After all, compared to the Church of England's records, only a handful of sex offenders have ties to the King and his family. And if by Christmas Day Charles had still allowed Andrew to escape; 30 room mansionan explanation can probably wait after all this time.
Even if you don't want commercial entanglements to spoil the King's healing Christmas speech, it might be wise to remove references to Bethlehem this year. These can be very exciting for tax compliance.
