In hyperpartisan environment, MSNBC drawing fire for anti-Trump, pro-Harris programming

There's so much bias and exaggeration in cable TV news that it's hard to know what to believe.

Depending on the network, coverage can seem like you're hopping between different galaxies.

And overall trust in the media has unsurprisingly plummeted to a new low.

Most people don't even trust fact-checkers, so there's no basic agreement about what's true and what's a lie in this crazy presidential election – no common information base on which everyone can debate.

Anti-Trump coverage contrasts with optimistic coverage of Kamala

This also applies to podcasters and social media influencers who have had a major impact on the media world.

Fox News, of course, receives the most scrutiny because its viewership far exceeds that of its two cable news rivals, but there is little scrutiny of MSNBC, an ultra-liberal institution, perhaps because many employees of The New York Times and The Washington Post are paid contributors or regular customers, making their left-leaning environment seem normal.

On a rare occasion, someone will write an article saying, “That place is so liberal.” But another barometer is that Biden's former press secretary, Jen Psaki, has her own show, and Symone Sanders-Townsend, a former aide to Vice President Kamala Harris, co-hosts a weekend show.

In fairness, MSNBC has some excellent journalists — no matter what Steve Kornacki says on the big monitor, I believe him — and MS also benefits from news packages delivered by experienced NBC reporters.

Mediaite's Colby Hall It's common knowledge, he says, that “MSNBC has devised a profitable model designed around programming that appeals to progressive, liberal and center-left audiences, and then sells those viewers to multi-billion dollar corporations who use them to advertise pharmaceuticals, cars and fossil fuels.”

“As we approach a crucial election, MSNBC's blatant support of the Harris-Waltz campaign goes even further than what a news network should reasonably be doing.”

Trump blames Kamala for second assassination attempt, Democrats blame Trump for Haitians in Ohio

Hall makes similar claims about Fox, but says that “MSNBC is largely tolerated by the same groups that are intent on forcing each other to engage on social media.”

I'll talk more about that later.

“And there's a relentless pro-Harris following rampant on the networks, perhaps best exemplified by Chris Hayes. say Donny Deutsch says Kamala Harris' performance in the debate with Trump was the “greatest performance” of all time because Trump “had no control over her mind.” admit He said after Harris' campaign kickoff speech that he had “kind of fallen in love” with her.

MSNBC host Jen Psaki speaks at the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival in Austin on September 6, 2024. (Joseph A. Wolfson/Fox News Digital)

The conclusion: “Perhaps most reprehensible is the complete lack of any negative news about Ms. Harris on air…Let's not pretend they're close to the press when in recent weeks they've come across as more of an arm of political propaganda working for the Democratic Party.”

Now, what most critics overlook because it doesn't fit the narrative is that Fox has a news division, of which I am a part, where hard-working journalists and producers do their best to tell the truth.

Naturally, most of the attention has been given to the prominent conservative hosts of the opinion shows after 5pm, but it would be a mistake to portray that as all there is to Fox News.

Scandals, assassination attempts, political rhetoric: both have their highs and lows.

Here's the proof: On big nights like conventions, debates, and elections, Fox's news hosts are Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, who in my opinion are the best in the business, and CNN hosts Jake Tapper and Dana Bash or Anderson Cooper.

But MSNBC is stocked with liberal commentators like Rachel Maddow, Nicolle Wallace, Joy Reid, Chris Hayes, Lawrence O'Donnell, and maybe Alex Wagner. Not since Brian Williams left MSNBC long after the controversy that cost him his NBC anchor job has there been even a glimmer of a nationally known anchor taking a centrist position.

Networks are making choices based on who they want to see, which could result in them broadcasting campaign propaganda, as Hall put it.

Fox News' Martha MacCallum and Bret Baier (Alex Wroblewski/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Maggie Haberman, the ace New York Times reporter and CNN analyst, takes a more optimistic view.

“I think the media has covered Trump very well,” she told NPR. “There are always stories written on deadline that could have been done better, should have been done better, but people aren't reporting as accurately as they should be.”

But Haberman argues that “there's an industry dedicated to attacking the media, particularly as it relates to covering Donald Trump and all reporting about Trump. I think Trump is a really difficult person to cover because he's challenged the journalistic process every day, for years. The system is fundamentally not designed to deal with someone who frequently says things that are not true as he does, or who says things that are incoherent as he does.”

She added that the media is not a monolith and “most of what the public knows about Trump comes from media reports.”

Click here to get the FOX News app

To be sure, the right has attacked media widely perceived as liberal. On CNN's nightly panels, media critics of Trump or fawning over Kamala often outnumber him by a 6-to-1 margin. Trump himself has led attacks on “enemies of the people,” often lashing out at individual journalists.

But some on the left, not just Fox but other conservative media outlets, have vigorously defended President Trump and attacked Harris for being too harsh in her criticism.

As Maggie knows better than anyone, being caught in a gunfight can be pretty unpleasant, but taking the blame is part of the job we all take on.