Health and fitness expert Gillian Michaels criticized The New York Times on Tuesday for what she labeled “a blatant hit piece.” In a post on X, she pointed to a recent video essay that she and other Pro Maha influencers believe falsely accused millions of American leaders of promoting conspiracy theories that undermine trust in the healthcare system. Michaels noted that the Times had previously presented her views more fairly in August.
“I gave @nytimes credit for an honest and balanced portrayal of my position. Two weeks later? A blatant hit,” she stated. The Times’ Opinion video grouped her with other Pro Maha advocates, claiming they incite a rejection of traditional medicine among Americans. A clip showed Michaels saying, “I won’t take Advil,” which was used to argue that these influencers are radicalizing their followers against the healthcare system.
The video featured commentary from Stockton, who suggested that these influencers manipulate fears, using wellness content as a vehicle for conspiracy theories. Another clip included Michaels stating, “I don’t think I’ll ever take an mRNA vaccine.”
Michaels, a supporter of alternative health practices and an advocate for banning harmful food ingredients, defended her position, asserting that her inquiries about health and food are constructive. She emphasized, “For 30 years, I’ve said the same thing. Every drug and vaccine have risks and rewards. A smart approach weighs the cost-effectiveness with a doctor rather than blind acceptance or blind rejection.” The Times profile published on August 25 reflected some of her more controversial beliefs, including views on childhood gender transitions and concerns about vaccine research.
Michaels expressed gratitude for that earlier profile but questioned the sudden shift in portrayal. “If they were confused, they could have read the work they had just run to me,” she remarked, expressing curiosity about why the Times would initiate such a smear campaign. She questioned, “What are you desperate to cover? Why is America so intentional to abandon our people who are taken seriously and ask why they can’t concentrate more on prevention?”
A spokesperson for The New York Times responded, saying that the video journalism aimed to provide clarity on the MAHA movement, featuring various clips from officials, media figures, and wellness influencers, including Michaels herself.
