Judge James Boasberg condemned President Donald Trump’s administration to the court, acknowledging the “presumed cause” that argued it was a violation of the court order.
As reported by Breitbart News, Trump has now led to alien enemies deporting hundreds of illegal alien de lagua and MS-13 gang members.
The left-wing American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Soros-related democracy sued the Trump administration to stop the deportation on behalf of five illegal aliens accused of gang members, but two planes of nearly 300 gang members have already taken off for El Salvador.
Boasburg issued Temporary suppression orders (TROs) are made to block Trump from using alien enemies and deport illegal alien gang members. Trump officials said they received orders from Boasberg when gang members had already landed in El Salvador.
The Supreme Court then vacated Boasberg’s temporary restraining order, finding that Trump has the authority to use alien enemy laws to deport such gang members from the United States.
Wednesday, Boasburg issued A memorandum stating that he has a “presumed cause” to hold the Trump administration in court’s empt for what he claims is a “willful neglect” of previous order.
“As this opinion details, the court ultimately found that the actions of the government that day were intentionally ignoring the order, and was sufficient to conclude that there is a possible cause for the court to find a government of criminal contense,” wrote Boasberg. “The court does not reach such conclusions lightly or in a hurry. In fact, it has given the defendants a sufficient opportunity to correct or explain their actions. None of their reactions are satisfactory.”
“Nevertheless, this investigation into compliance may ask how this compliance investigation could proceed given the Supreme Court eviction of the TRO after the events in question,” Boasberg continued.
However, the court’s subsequent decision that TRO suffered from legal flaws does not excuse government violations. Instead, until the court overturns it, all judicial orders are “a fundamental legal lesson that no matter how much “false”, “false”, “false”, “false”, “false”, “false”, “false”, it is “basic”, “false”, and “false”. If the parties choose to violate the order rather than wait for the reverse through the judicial process, such disobedience is punished as light empty, despite the imperfections of the order that are obscure in the later period. That basic “rule of law” isn’t just how this compliance inquiry proceeds, but why it must. The rules reflect the belief that “in a fair judicial administration, no one can judge in his own case.” [Emphasis added]
The Constitution does not tolerate intentional disobedience of judicial orders. Especially by officials of the Coordinate Branch who have made a pledge to support it. Allowing such officials to “eliminate the decisions of US courts” is not just “destroying the rights acquired on these decisions.” That would create a “stricken ock ha ha” of the “Constitution itself.” “A fatal consequence must be condemned by everyone.” [Emphasis added]
…
For the foregoing reasons, the court will find the cause in which the defendant’s actions could constitute a light empty. It offers them the opportunity to cleanse such light empty. If they choose not to do so, the court will identify Contemnor and introduce the matter to the prosecution. Due to a different order, it will be issued this day. [Emphasis added]
Previously, Attorney General Pam Bondy summoned the state’s secret privileges on all information surrounding deportation flights and gang members who were on the flight.
“The administrative officer will notify the court that no further information will be provided in response to the court’s tiny order of March 18, 2025, when he filed the State’s Secretary’s Declaration at the same time as the state’s secret privilege,” Bondi wrote at the time.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him to jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
