New York State Supreme Court Justice Juan Marchan, who is handling former President Donald Trump’s New York criminal case, is a Biden donor, Trump’s lawyer Jesse Vinal said during an appearance on the show. Breitbart News Daily.
Vinall was referring to a lawsuit involving Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who indicted Trump on 34 felonies for falsifying business records in connection with “hush money” payments to Stormy Daniels. he argued, reminding the audience that this entire case was “based on events.” Words by Michael Cohen,” “Acknowledged Perjurer.”
Related video — Trump supporters show solidarity outside New York City courthouse ahead of trial:
“That’s the best they have. That’s what they’re building a case against…is someone who lied in court, and the fact is this case is completely baseless.” He reminded the audience that Judge Marchand is a Biden donor.
“Let’s remember that Judge Marchand is a Biden donor. Let’s not forget the fact that his family has a vested financial interest in this case or…the case is ongoing. . I think they are trying to drag this case out as long as possible to influence the presidential election,” Vinal said.
Michael Cohen leaves for a break during former President Donald Trump’s civil business fraud trial in New York Supreme Court on October 24, 2023. (AP Photo/Stephen Jeremiah)
In fact, Judge Marchan made three donations to Democrats in 2020, opening the door to an ethics investigation.
When asked how and why a judge could be a donor, Vinal said that was not the case.
He explained that there are “very special cases in which a judge has to step back from a case,” and this is “most important” when there is evidence of bias by the judge or against a criminal defendant. He pointed out that there is.
Judge Juan Machan poses for a photo in his New York courtroom on March 14, 2024. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
“And that person has the right to a clean slate before the trial begins. And judges who cannot do that, who approach trials with preconceived notions about the defendant, should recuse themselves from the case.” He said this was a “notable” example of a judge contributing a candidate’s contributions. Political enemy. “
listen:
“Until now, I have never known a judge who made political contributions while serving as a judge. It is extremely unusual for a judge to even make political contributions. “The fact that he has shown his allegiance and then confines himself to an incident that has a huge impact on the presidential election is extremely inappropriate.”
“It not only shows he’s a bigot, it shows his biased attitude, and we in this country have lived under the rule of law for about 250 years. These… Decisions are made on the basis of law, not men, and as far as our legal system is concerned, they are not based on the political beliefs of individual people. And that is now completely thrown into question. He wanted so much to be involved in this case…that’s why he refused to recuse himself.”He continued, “The company she worked for filed a lawsuit, and the lawsuit is “ongoing” because of his daughter.” “It’s a good thing for the judge,” he said, noting that “millions and millions of dollars are at stake.”
“And this is something in which his family has a direct…financial interest and, again, at least a manifestation of impropriety here,” Vinal added.
“He truly jeopardizes our entire judicial system because he simply does not follow the norms of judicial conduct,” Vinal concluded.
Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. ET.
