Keith Kellogg proposes replacing NATO, labels the alliance as ‘cowards’

Kellogg Critiques NATO’s Response to Iran Conflict

Retired Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg has expressed strong criticism towards NATO, labeling the organization as “cowardly” and ineffective in its handling of the current conflict involving Iran. During a recent appearance on “Hannity,” Kellogg suggested that perhaps NATO might need a complete overhaul.

“It’s NATO’s turn to step up, but they seem afraid,” he stated, implying that the current dynamics are not working. He further proposed the idea of creating a new defense structure altogether.

Kellogg pointed to Article 13 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which allows member states to leave NATO one year after notifying the alliance, indicating this could be a potential solution for dissatisfied members.

He suggested that the U.S. could explore alternative defense partnerships. “We should consider forming a coalition with European nations ready to engage, along with allies like Japan and Australia, and newly cooperative nations such as Germany and Poland. Ukraine has also shown to be a reliable ally in this situation,” he added.

Victoria Coats, who previously served as a national security adviser, echoed Kellogg’s sentiments, describing NATO as “inconsequential.” She emphasized the organization’s inability to address major conflicts in Europe and questioned its relevance in the Middle East, stating, “I wish we had their support, but recent actions show what the U.S. can accomplish with willing allies like Israel.”

Coats noted that the damage done to Iran’s military serves as a significant deterrent to both Russia and China.

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo described the current state of NATO as “heartbreaking,” highlighting his longstanding belief in the alliance’s importance. He lamented their apparent recklessness and inability to convey to their own citizens why the U.S. actions, especially in collaboration with Israel, are crucial for their safety.