President Donald Trump and his administration have long been targets of left-wing-motivated law, dating back to his first term. Democrats played semantic games to classify these attacks as anything other than politically motivating, but one lawmaker finally yelled out the quiet part.
California Democrat Laura Friedman said City Hall participants Monday when she and her colleagues meet regularly at a closed door meeting dedicated to planning legal attacks on Trump and his administration.
This practice has become common within Democrats, but Republicans in Congress do what they can to stop it.
“Every week there is a litigation working group that has a large group of us. There may be 75 members of the house. [attorneys general] To talk about legal strategies,” Friedman. I said. “This is all done backstage every week. It’s non-stop.”
Friedman quickly diluted the severity of her entry by referring to the additional, more general paths politicians use to attack each other.
“It’s a non-stop introduction of bills and law, and without the crazy analysis you know, and all of this, it’s on social media as non-stop as we can,” Friedman said.
Friedman finally confirmed that Democrats would actually coordinate behind closed doors to weaponize the judicial system against their political enemies. This practice has become common within Democrats, but Republicans in Congress do what they can to stop it.
In light of Friedman’s statement, it is clear that these safety measures are more important than ever.
Over the past few weeks, many federal judges have blocked many of Trump’s executive orders in an attempt to curb his administration. Most famously, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg blocked the deportation of illegal immigrants from Venezuela despite his partnership with violent gangster Tren de Aragua.
As a result, both House and Senate Republicans introduced legislation to combat these fraudulent judges.
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee introduced the Detainee Judicial Activists Act in late March. This will establish a district court with three judges to confirm the judgment against the administrative department. At the same time, California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa introduced a fraudulent control law that restricts the power of impose a national injunction for district judges. Issa’s bill passed the House of Representatives in early April and is now heading for the Senate.
In light of Friedman’s statement, it is clear that these safety measures are more important than ever.
Like Blaze News? Bypass censorship, sign up for our newsletter and get stories like these directly into your inbox. Sign up here!
