The majority of Americans are against it Federal judge’s actions. Those managing President Trump’s budget cuts and agency closures were identified as the individuals who had control over President Trump.
According to the Marquette University Law School survey, 70% of participants expressed disapproval of federal judges’ actions against anti-Trump decisions regarding budget cuts and agency shutdowns, while 30% were in favor of the judges’ actions.
Last week, two GOP representatives filed a resolution aiming at two federal judges.
Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) stated he put forward a resolution against U.S. District Court Justice Judge John McConnell, who had issued an order in March to halt the Trump administration’s freeze on federal spending.
Another Republican, Rep. Andy Ogres (Tennessee), disclosed last week that he had filed a resolution against US district judge Theodore Chuan. In March, Chuan prevented high-tech tycoon Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from further dismantling the US Agency for International Development (USAID).
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas), the third Republican, introduced a resolution targeting Judge James Boasberg.
Nevertheless, these resolutions against the judges are generally perceived as ineffective attempts on Capitol Hill. Doubts among several Republicans might hinder passage in the House, and gaining a Senate conviction would need backing from at least 14 Democrats.
Other insights from the Marquette Act survey revealed that 65% opposed the abolition of the Department of Education, while 35% were in favor of disbanding the department.
Later last month, the president endorsed an executive order aimed at achieving his objective of dismantling the Department of Education.
The Marquette Law School polls were conducted with a sample of 1,021 respondents and an error margin of plus or minus 3.5% from March 17th to 25th.
