total-news-1024x279-1__1_-removebg-preview.png

LANGUAGE

‘No Default, No Revenue Share:’ Google Antitrust Trial Puts Pressure Tactics in the Spotlight

The ongoing landmark antitrust case against Google is shedding light on the internet giant’s relentless efforts to dominate online search, securing its position as the default search engine on a global scale. reveals the company’s strategic moves and exclusive agreements with major partners such as Apple and Samsung.

of wall street journal report Google, the tech giant that facilitates about 90% of all online searches, is under investigation thanks to an ongoing antitrust case against the company. The Justice Department argues that Google maintains this position through illegal and restrictive agreements, providing a rare glimpse into the complex web of partnerships and negotiations that have underpinned Google’s rise to fame. are doing.

Sundar Pichai Google CEO ( Carsten Koall /Getty)

The case examined how Google leveraged its advantage in dialogue with its major partner Apple to ensure its search engine remained the default option on most smartphones around the world. It became clear that Back in 2005, Google offered Apple a lucrative deal in which it would give it a cut of advertising revenue and make its search engine the default choice on desktop computers. The move was crucial given that Google’s search engine powers an advertising business that raked in $162 billion last year and accounts for a significant portion of the parent company’s revenue.

In one case revealed in court, Apple’s attempt to offer users several options for a default search engine was met with a harsh response from Google: “No default, no revenue share.” The heavy-handed tactics led Apple to abandon the idea, a decision that has not been reviewed since then, said Kenneth Dinzer, the Justice Department’s chief trial attorney.

The revelations extend beyond Apple, touching on Google’s relationship with Samsung. The case highlighted how Google influenced Samsung’s design tweaks related to its default search engine, and revealed that users were finding it difficult to switch away from Google’s search engine. When Samsung’s design changes made it easier for users to change their default search engine, Google claimed breach of contract and forced Samsung to roll back the changes.

The case also highlighted the impact of Google’s default agreement on other search engine providers. His CEO at DuckDuckGo, Gabriel Weinberg, testified that these agreements effectively hampered the company’s ability to gain market share, highlighting the challenges competitors face in a Google-dominated environment.

read more of wall street journal here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering free speech and online censorship issues.

Leave a Reply

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Telegram
WhatsApp