New York Times plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey has released a “complete analysis” of the allegations against Vice President Kamala Harris, which turns out to be “more serious” than originally thought.
“At the time, I did not know the full document containing further allegations, and some criticized the New York Times for not providing me with that information. However, the article states that it did not respond to those allegations. It is clearly stated that this was my “first reaction”. This is not a complete analysis,” Bailey wrote. plagiarism today Wednesday. “Today I reviewed a complete document produced by Dr. Stefan Weber, whom I have previously covered. I also peer-reviewed one of his papers in 2018.”
“With this new information, I believe the case is more serious than I commented to the New York Times, but the important point remains: This study is problematic, but this pattern does not allow fraud to occur. “It shows sloppy writing habits, not malice,” he added.
Plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey said at the time that he only considered examples given to him by the New York Times. (Getty Images)
Kamala Harris accused of plagiarizing book on 'Being Smart Against Crime' in 2009
“Is it a problem? Yes. But it's also not a massive scam like many are claiming. This falls somewhere in the middle of what both sides want,” he said. .
Mr. Bailey continued to argue that these examples were more like sloppy work or negligence on Harris' part than malice, but that some, particularly the two paragraphs copied directly from Wikipedia, were clear examples of plagiarism. acknowledged.
“To be clear, this is plagiarism. It is made worse by the fact that Wikipedia is generally not considered a reliable source of information. And, according to Weber, the information was in error. Yes,” Bailey wrote.
“Ultimately, I realize that this view won't make anyone happy. I don't think this book is the product of large-scale malicious plagiarism, and I don't think there's anything wrong with it.” I don't think so, regardless of your side.'' That's probably not a satisfactory answer. ”
in new york times In an article dissecting the claims, Mr. Bailey argued that these examples were “false and not intended to defraud.” He accused conservative activist Chris Rufo, who reported the story, of committing a minor violation and trying to “make a big deal out of it.”
Harris is accused of plagiarizing more than 20 passages from his 2009 book. (AP/Jacqueline Martin)
But then he Revealed in X He said he only reviewed five examples provided by the New York Times and had not seen the full analysis.
“To those who came here from the New York Times article, I want to be clear that I have not done a complete analysis of this book. My quotes are based on information provided by the reporter. I spoke only of those texts,” he wrote. .
For more information on media and culture, click here
Mr Rufo reported for the first time on Monday on Austrian professor Stefan Weber, a so-called “plagiarism hunter” who found 27 times that Mr Harris and his co-authors were suspected of committing some form of plagiarism. The fragment is plagiarized from another author, [and] Three fragments are self-plagiarized from works written with co-authors. ”
Conservative activist Christopher Rufo reported on the allegations on Monday. ((Photo Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images), Right: (Photo Credit: Thomas Simonetti for The Washington Post via Getty Images))
“Taken together, there is certainly a violation of standards here. Harris and his co-authors reproduced long passages almost verbatim, without proper citations or quotation marks. This is the definition of textbook plagiarism. ” Rufo wrote.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
