David Lynch’s Legacy: A Mixed Bag of Responses

In Hollywood, it’s often the unexpected that captures attention. David Lynch, co-creator and director of “Twin Peaks,” died on January 16, 2025, at 78. According to reports from TMZ, he left behind a significant fortune for his four children and made substantial gifts to close friends. Court documents indicate that his trust is set to cover educational and medical expenses for his kids.

Lynch’s assets are quite impressive. They include a stake in the “Twin Peaks” production, stock in a production company, various copyrights, an $11 million mansion in Los Angeles, and two additional multimillion-dollar properties.

It’s generally seen as commendable to leave one’s assets to family and friends. But not everyone shares this view. Among some elite circles, particularly those leaning left, disinheriting children is increasingly viewed as a moral stance.

Many celebrities have claimed they will donate their fortunes to charity instead. For example, Simon Cowell once stated he would prefer to pass his money to a charity—or even to his dog—rather than allowing it to flow down to future generations. It’s a thought-provoking perspective, honestly. Why should an only child be prioritized over someone else in need?

Then there’s Jackie Chan. He has two children but plans to give away his wealth. He shared that growing up in poverty made him want everything; now he finds joy in giving to others.

Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis, who started their romance on the set of “That ’70s Show,” also plan to donate their wealth. Kutcher expressed in a 2018 interview that he wouldn’t be setting up a trust for their kids, preferring to support charitable causes instead.

Even Daniel Craig, known for his iconic James Bond role, has spoken against inheritance. He finds the notion unpleasant and would rather pass on his wealth while he’s still alive.

The idea of inheritance can clash with views shaped by indulgent upbringings, where wealth was often wasted on extravagant luxuries. For those who have raised responsible children, though, it seems only natural to consider them as beneficiaries. After all, who better to handle your legacy than your own kids?